Re: s390: struct device - replace bus_id with dev_name(), dev_set_name()

Kay Sievers
2008-10-30T15:52:07Z

On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 16:46, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 03:58:21PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:38, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:32:00AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 01:57:07 +0100,
>> >> Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
>> >> > Subject: s390: struct device - replace bus_id with dev_name(), dev_set_name()
>> >> >
>> >> > Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
>> >> > Cc: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
>> >> > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
>> >> > Signed-Off-By: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
>> >>
>> >> Other than the fact that this patch is a bit mis-named (it just gets
>> >> rid of BUS_ID_SIZE), this looks fine to me.
>>
>> Yeah, sorry, it's one of the 49 patches, where the subjects isn't
>> right, because you did the conversion already. :)
>>
>> > Who is supposed to send this upstream and when?
>>
>> Would be fine if it goes through the s390 tree, and gets merged there
>> soon so it shows up in -next.
>
> Just to get this right: it doesn't depend on any other patches and is
> fine as a standalone patch, right?
> Sorry, this isn't obvious for me ;)

The stuff it depends on, we already put into .27. It should not depend
on anything not in a released version, yes.

Kay