Re: s390: struct device - replace bus_id with dev_name(), dev_set_name()

[Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>]

On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 03:58:21PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:38, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:32:00AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >> On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 01:57:07 +0100,
> >> Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
> >> > Subject: s390: struct device - replace bus_id with dev_name(), dev_set_name()
> >> >
> >> > Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
> >> > Cc: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
> >> > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
> >> > Signed-Off-By: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
> >>
> >> Other than the fact that this patch is a bit mis-named (it just gets
> >> rid of BUS_ID_SIZE), this looks fine to me.
> 
> Yeah, sorry, it's one of the 49 patches, where the subjects isn't
> right, because you did the conversion already. :)
> 
> > Who is supposed to send this upstream and when?
> 
> Would be fine if it goes through the s390 tree, and gets merged there
> soon so it shows up in -next.

Just to get this right: it doesn't depend on any other patches and is
fine as a standalone patch, right?
Sorry, this isn't obvious for me ;)