From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
"jens.axboe@oracle.com" <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
"paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com" <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>,
"nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au" <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
"torvalds@linux-foundation.org" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] generic-ipi: fix the smp_mb() placement
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:23:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081030202322.GM30573@linux-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081030185322.GE17822@elte.hu>
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:53:22AM -0700, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > Subject: generic-ipi: fix the smp_mb() placement
> >
> > smp_mb() is needed (to make the memory operations visible globally)
> > before sending the ipi on the sender and the receiver (on Alpha
> > atleast) needs smp_read_barrier_depends() in the handler before
> > reading the call_single_queue list in a lock-free fashion.
> >
> > On x86, x2apic mode register accesses for sending IPI's don't have
> > serializing semantics. So the need for smp_mb() before sending the
> > IPI becomes more critical in x2apic mode.
> >
> > Remove the unnecessary smp_mb() in csd_flag_wait(), as the presence
> > of that smp_mb() doesn't mean anything on the sender, when the ipi
> > receiver is not doing any thing special (like memory fence) after
> > clearing the CSD_FLAG_WAIT.
>
> nice! Did you see an actual lockup due to this?
We didn't see the lockup in our tests but Xen folks reported similar failures
with their smp call function code.
> Seems like a v2.6.28 fix to me in any case.
Yes.
thanks,
suresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-30 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-29 22:42 [patch] generic-ipi: fix the smp_mb() placement Suresh Siddha
2008-10-30 7:20 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-30 16:30 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-10-30 17:25 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-30 18:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-30 20:23 ` Suresh Siddha [this message]
2008-10-31 5:10 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-10-31 9:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-31 11:12 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-10-31 16:53 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-10-31 20:30 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-11-03 10:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-03 23:48 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-11-04 9:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-04 22:25 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-11-05 9:20 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081030202322.GM30573@linux-os.sc.intel.com \
--to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox