From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: cpu2000(both float and int) 13% regression with 2.6.28-rc1
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:02:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081031100201.GA17426@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <490A5A80.3070203@zytor.com>
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> >
> > We figured out that this is not related to signals. But to this mismerge here
> >
> >> +#define X86_FEATURE_AMDC1E (3*32+21) /* AMD C1E detected */
> >> + #define X86_FEATURE_XTOPOLOGY (3*32+21) /* cpu topology enum extensions */
> >
> > I had earler sent a patch to fix this.
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122341178202930&w=2
> >
> > But, somehow I don’t see this patch either in Linus's git or in tip.
> >
> > ingo, hpa: Can you push that patch along.
> >
>
> OK, thought it already had been. I will investigate later tonight.
i've picked it up into x86/urgent - see the commit below.
Ingo
--------------->
>From 2576c9991758e431b73e374f6019d6e1e12a8d36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:33:12 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] x86: fix AMDC1E and XTOPOLOGY conflict in cpufeature
Impact: fix xsave slowdown regression
Fix two features from conflicting in feature bits.
Fixes this performance regression:
Subject: cpu2000(both float and int) 13% regression with 2.6.28-rc1
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/28/36
Reported-by: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Bisected-by: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index f73e95d..cfdf8c2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@
#define X86_FEATURE_11AP (3*32+19) /* "" Bad local APIC aka 11AP */
#define X86_FEATURE_NOPL (3*32+20) /* The NOPL (0F 1F) instructions */
#define X86_FEATURE_AMDC1E (3*32+21) /* AMD C1E detected */
-#define X86_FEATURE_XTOPOLOGY (3*32+21) /* cpu topology enum extensions */
+#define X86_FEATURE_XTOPOLOGY (3*32+22) /* cpu topology enum extensions */
/* Intel-defined CPU features, CPUID level 0x00000001 (ecx), word 4 */
#define X86_FEATURE_XMM3 (4*32+ 0) /* "pni" SSE-3 */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-31 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-28 6:32 cpu2000(both float and int) 13% regression with 2.6.28-rc1 Zhang, Yanmin
2008-10-28 8:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-28 8:31 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-10-28 20:26 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-10-31 0:32 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-10-31 1:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-10-31 10:02 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-10-31 15:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-10-31 1:15 ` Zhang, Yanmin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081031100201.GA17426@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox