From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@xs4all.net>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: disk statistics issue in 2.6.27
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:47:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081031124743.GH31673@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1224777902.26805.17.camel@n2o.xs4all.nl>
On Thu, Oct 23 2008, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 19:17 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 22 2008, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 19:12 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Oct 19 2008, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> >
> > > > > I noticed that the "iostat -k -x 2" output does't make any sense.
> > > > > The number of reads/sec and number of writes/sec are about what I
> > > > > would expect, and so are the other fields, but rkB/sec and wkB/sec
> > > > > are completely off-scale: gigabytes read/written per second.
> > > >
> > >
> > > > Are the reported values in iostat any sort of multiple of the real
> > > > throughtput, or is is just insanely large?
> > >
> > > It looks like it's a multiple, but it appears to vary between 128 and
> > > 512, and is different for reads and writes, so I do not know what to
> > > make of it.
> > >
>
> I added some debug statements to block/blk-core.c, and it appears that
> blk_end_io() is always called with nr_bytes == 16320 Kbytes (16711680).
>
> Ofcourse I should have noticed earlier that iostat -x 2 always prints
> 32640 as "average request size" (in sectors).
You didn't happen to log a backtrace from that, did you? That's a weird
nr_bytes, it's 0xff0000.
I'm assuming this then fixes it, just wondering what the heck is going
on here.
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 33c8d4b..a372618 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -1712,11 +1710,12 @@ static int __end_that_request_first(struct request *req, int error,
if (blk_fs_request(req) && req->rq_disk) {
const int rw = rq_data_dir(req);
struct hd_struct *part;
- int cpu;
+ int cpu, sectors;
+ sectors = min_t(int, nr_bytes >> 9, req->hard_nr_sectors);
cpu = part_stat_lock();
part = disk_map_sector_rcu(req->rq_disk, req->sector);
- part_stat_add(cpu, part, sectors[rw], nr_bytes >> 9);
+ part_stat_add(cpu, part, sectors[rw], sectors);
part_stat_unlock();
}
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-31 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-19 11:31 disk statistics issue in 2.6.27 Miquel van Smoorenburg
2008-10-20 17:12 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-22 14:37 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2008-10-22 17:17 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-23 16:05 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2008-10-31 12:47 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2008-11-03 21:39 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081031124743.GH31673@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikevs@xs4all.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox