From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: sched domains oddness.
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:37:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081031173737.GA11443@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081031171721.GA8837@redhat.com>
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 01:17:21PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:09:29AM -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
>
> > > looks like someone is triggering rebuild_sched_domains(), is something
> > > poking cpusetfs files or flipping between sched_mc settings?
> >
> > I remember someone mentioning that some distro's started setting
> > sched_mc_power_savings to '1' by default during boot. On a dual-core
> > laptop, this will not give any advantage.
> >
> > I have to fix the code to not export this tunable, when we have only
> > socket in the system.
> >
> > Dave, Is your distro also setting this tunable blindly during boot :(
>
> (13:15:25:davej@vaio:~)$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/sched_mc_power_savings
> 0
>
> So no, unless something set it to 1, and then back to 0.
>
> A grep of etc shows up nothing in initscripts. Does hal or something
> play with this?
Even curiouser.. When I unplug AC and replug it, it happens again, but slightly
differently..
CPU0 attaching NULL sched-domain.
CPU1 attaching NULL sched-domain.
CPU0 attaching sched-domain:
domain 0: span 0-1 level MC
groups: 0 1
domain 1: span 0-1 level CPU
groups: 0-1
domain 2: span 0-1 level NODE
groups: 0-1
CPU1 attaching sched-domain:
domain 0: span 0-1 level MC
groups: 1 0
domain 1: span 0-1 level CPU
groups: 0-1
domain 2: span 0-1 level NODE
groups: 0-1
CPU0 attaching NULL sched-domain.
CPU1 attaching NULL sched-domain.
CPU0 attaching sched-domain:
domain 0: span 0-1 level MC
groups: 0 1
domain 1: span 0-1 level NODE
groups: 0-1
CPU1 attaching sched-domain:
domain 0: span 0-1 level MC
groups: 1 0
domain 1: span 0-1 level NODE
groups: 0-1
Note how the CPU level doesn't show up in the 2nd case.
This still doesn't explain the flip-flop I saw just from booting,
as that was on AC the whole time.
I grepped hal and gnome-power-manager, and didn't see anything
touching sched_mc
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-31 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-31 16:24 sched domains oddness Dave Jones
2008-10-31 16:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-31 17:09 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-10-31 17:17 ` Dave Jones
2008-10-31 17:37 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2008-10-31 17:58 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-10-31 19:08 ` Dave Jones
2008-10-31 17:19 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081031173737.GA11443@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox