From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756815AbYKDWsh (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Nov 2008 17:48:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754838AbYKDWs0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Nov 2008 17:48:26 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:50141 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754731AbYKDWsZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Nov 2008 17:48:25 -0500 Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:48:00 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20081104.144800.158229098.davem@davemloft.net> To: shemminger@vyatta.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: increase receive packet quantum From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20081103212521.15e12168@extreme> References: <20081103130303.29dd4e21@extreme> <20081103.172428.154364341.davem@davemloft.net> <20081103212521.15e12168@extreme> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.1 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Stephen Hemminger Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 21:25:21 -0800 > On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:24:28 -0800 (PST) > David Miller wrote: > > > I'll apply this to net-next-2.6, thanks Stephen. > > Maybe you want it as part of the tbench regression recovery in 2.6.28? > it seems mostly harmless. Maybe... I'd rather have it cook in net-next-2.6 for a while. Taking up more than a jiffie in softirq context is bordering on anti-social and could cause problems especially for RT'ish stuff. And I'm pretty sure that's why I made the change.