From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754930AbYKDUsU (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Nov 2008 15:48:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752055AbYKDUsM (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Nov 2008 15:48:12 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:43872 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752002AbYKDUsL (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Nov 2008 15:48:11 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 12:47:53 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: David Rientjes Cc: cl@linux-foundation.org, npiggin@suse.de, peterz@infradead.org, menage@google.com, dfults@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 0/7] cpuset writeback throttling Message-Id: <20081104124753.fb1dde5a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:23:10 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes wrote: > This is the revised cpuset writeback throttling patchset I'm all confused about why this is a cpuset thing rather than a cgroups thing. What are the relationships here? I mean, writeback throttling _should_ operate upon a control group (more specifically: a memcg), yes? I guess you're assuming a 1:1 relationship here?