From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Ken Chen <kenchen@google.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: fix single-depth wchan output
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 07:11:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081106061125.GA6384@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b040c32a0811052158r4f6662dega3503a0c7ec72620@mail.gmail.com>
* Ken Chen <kenchen@google.com> wrote:
> To get a meaningful /proc/<pid>/wchan, one is required to turn on
> full frame pointer when compile kernel/sched.c on x86 arch. The
> enabling of frame pointer applies to entire kernel/sched.c and
> affects lots of other core scheduler functions that aren't related
> to wchan's call stack unwind. This causes unnecessary expansion of
> stack pointer push and pop on the stack for scheduler functions. To
> cut down the cost of frame pointer push/pop, one can use compile
> time config option 'single-depth wchan'. However, the
> 'single-depth' option is broken on x86 due to lack of stack frame
> marker and simple stack unwind doesn't work, i.e., wchan always
> produces '0'.
>
> This patch adds call site location explicitly in thread_struct for
> schedule() function so that get_wchan() can reliably get the data
> and at the same time not to overly burden the entire kernel/sched.c
> with frame pointer generation. The remove of frame pointer
> dependency allows compiler to generate better and faster core
> scheduler code on x86_64.
hm, this adds overhead - and the thing is that WCHAN is rather
uninformative to begin with (because it's a single dimension), so we
should phase it out, not expand it.
How about adding a /proc/<PID>/stacktrace file that gives us the stack
trace of any task in the system? That would be useful for a number of
other purposes as well, and about 100 times more useful than wchan.
(often it would be more useful than sysrq-t dumps)
Hm?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-06 6:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-06 5:58 [patch] sched: fix single-depth wchan output Ken Chen
2008-11-06 6:11 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-11-06 6:16 ` Ken Chen
2008-11-06 6:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-06 6:42 ` Ken Chen
2008-11-06 6:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-06 7:28 ` Ken Chen
2008-11-06 7:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-06 22:33 ` Andi Kleen
2008-11-06 21:56 ` Matt Mackall
2008-11-06 22:30 ` Chris Friesen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081106061125.GA6384@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=kenchen@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox