public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Ken Chen <kenchen@google.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: fix single-depth wchan output
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 07:11:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081106061125.GA6384@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b040c32a0811052158r4f6662dega3503a0c7ec72620@mail.gmail.com>


* Ken Chen <kenchen@google.com> wrote:

> To get a meaningful /proc/<pid>/wchan, one is required to turn on 
> full frame pointer when compile kernel/sched.c on x86 arch.  The 
> enabling of frame pointer applies to entire kernel/sched.c and 
> affects lots of other core scheduler functions that aren't related 
> to wchan's call stack unwind.  This causes unnecessary expansion of 
> stack pointer push and pop on the stack for scheduler functions.  To 
> cut down the cost of frame pointer push/pop, one can use compile 
> time config option 'single-depth wchan'.  However, the 
> 'single-depth' option is broken on x86 due to lack of stack frame 
> marker and simple stack unwind doesn't work, i.e., wchan always 
> produces '0'.
> 
> This patch adds call site location explicitly in thread_struct for 
> schedule() function so that get_wchan() can reliably get the data 
> and at the same time not to overly burden the entire kernel/sched.c 
> with frame pointer generation.  The remove of frame pointer 
> dependency allows compiler to generate better and faster core 
> scheduler code on x86_64.

hm, this adds overhead - and the thing is that WCHAN is rather 
uninformative to begin with (because it's a single dimension), so we 
should phase it out, not expand it.

How about adding a /proc/<PID>/stacktrace file that gives us the stack 
trace of any task in the system? That would be useful for a number of 
other purposes as well, and about 100 times more useful than wchan. 
(often it would be more useful than sysrq-t dumps)

Hm?

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-06  6:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-06  5:58 [patch] sched: fix single-depth wchan output Ken Chen
2008-11-06  6:11 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-11-06  6:16   ` Ken Chen
2008-11-06  6:30     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-06  6:42       ` Ken Chen
2008-11-06  6:59         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-06  7:28           ` Ken Chen
2008-11-06  7:44             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-06 22:33       ` Andi Kleen
2008-11-06 21:56   ` Matt Mackall
2008-11-06 22:30     ` Chris Friesen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081106061125.GA6384@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=kenchen@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox