public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sct@redhat.com, adilger@sun.com,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, dedekind@infradead.org,
	ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	dushistov@mail.ru, jmorris@namei.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] filesystems: use has_capability_noaudit interface for reserved blocks checks
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:07:17 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081113230717.GA25117@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081113145316.e53858bd.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 02:53:16PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:12:49 -0500
> Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > ext[2,3,4], ufs, and ubifs all check for  CAP_SYS_RESOURCE to determine
> > if they should allow reserved blocks to be used.  A process not having
> > this capability is not failing some security decision and should not be
> > audited.  Thus move to using has_capability_noaudit.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > I would like to push this patch through the security tree (since that's
> > the only place the new cap_noaudit interface exists), but I'd like to
> > get an ACK from each subsystem maintainer.

For ext4:

Acked-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>

						- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-13 23:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-11 19:12 [PATCH] filesystems: use has_capability_noaudit interface for reserved blocks checks Eric Paris
2008-11-13  0:19 ` Mingming Cao
2008-11-13 22:53 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-13 23:07   ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2008-11-14  7:55 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-11-14 15:36   ` Eric Paris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081113230717.GA25117@mit.edu \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=adilger@sun.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dedekind@infradead.org \
    --cc=dushistov@mail.ru \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sct@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox