From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754072AbYKNRNG (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:13:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751009AbYKNRMz (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:12:55 -0500 Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:48777 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750918AbYKNRMy (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:12:54 -0500 Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:12:52 +0000 From: Matthew Garrett To: Alan Jenkins Cc: linux-kernel , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Add option to passively listen for PCIE hotplug events Message-ID: <20081114171252.GA29056@srcf.ucam.org> References: <49105BA6.9090403@tuffmail.co.uk> <20081104143332.GA21689@srcf.ucam.org> <491063B3.4080808@tuffmail.co.uk> <20081104151128.GA22544@srcf.ucam.org> <49106DD7.9010307@tuffmail.co.uk> <20081104155722.GA23314@srcf.ucam.org> <491076BD.1030704@tuffmail.co.uk> <49170B16.4010909@tuffmail.co.uk> <20081114161631.GA28234@srcf.ucam.org> <491DB048.3090308@tuffmail.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <491DB048.3090308@tuffmail.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@codon.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on vavatch.codon.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 05:07:20PM +0000, Alan Jenkins wrote: > Note that Xandros say the newest model EeePC (S101) 'is now using a > "normal" kill of the antenna, which is easier to work with'. Well, it would have been nice of them to try to solve the problem properly rather than jumping through hoops. > So if you're unlucky, the current eeepc-laptop worked perfectly on the > S101, and now it will simply refuse to load :). But it's probably safer > that way. At least the 701 runs quite adequately without eeepc-laptop. > I guess it can be fixed when someone interested gets their hands on an S101. Failing to register the notify handler isn't a fatal error, so shouldn't be an issue. It would be nice to see how it behaves in that case, though. If anyone's got an S101 I'd be interested in an ACPI dump. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org