Re: [GIT PATCH] USB patches for 2.6-git

[Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>]

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:40:48PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Greg KH wrote:
>
>>> Hi Greg,
>
>>> There is a difference in the musb patch I submitted and the one which 
>>> actually has been
>>> forwarded to you by Felipe. This difference has introduced a bug.
>
>>> The patch in you series is,
>>> usb: musb: fix BULK request on different available endpoints
>
>>> It was submitted by me at,
>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=122337227617797&w=2
>
>>> And the one which is forwarded to you by Felipe is at,
>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=122528597316728&w=2
>
>>> There is a difference in between above two as below.
>>> Original: +	if (best_end < 0 && qh->type == USB_ENDPOINT_XFER_BULK) {
>>> Sent to you: +	if (best_end > 0 && qh->type == USB_ENDPOINT_XFER_BULK) {
>
>>> It should be [best_end < 0].
>
>>> If it is possible then please correct this mismatch in your series.
>
>> I'll wait to get a patch from Felipe for this.
>
>    I'm seeing it being to you sent at least a week ago -- look for "usb: 
> musb: fix bug in musb_schedule".

As Felipe is the maintainer of the musb code, and has been batching up
patches and sending them on to me when needed, I have only been taking
them from him.

So that message is long deleted from my mail, sorry.

thanks,

greg k-h