public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [BUG] using smp_processor_id() in preemptible
@ 2008-11-15 23:30 Luis Henriques
  2008-11-16  7:10 ` Ingo Molnar
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Luis Henriques @ 2008-11-15 23:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: linux-kernel

Hi Ingo,

while running latencytop, got the following:

...
[  775.663239] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: latencytop/6585
[  775.663303] caller is native_sched_clock+0x3a/0x80
[  775.663314] Pid: 6585, comm: latencytop Tainted: G        W 2.6.28-rc4-00355-g9c7c354 #1
[  775.663322] Call Trace:
[  775.663343]  [<ffffffff803a94e4>] debug_smp_processor_id+0xe4/0xf0
[  775.663356]  [<ffffffff80213f7a>] native_sched_clock+0x3a/0x80
[  775.663368]  [<ffffffff80213e19>] sched_clock+0x9/0x10
[  775.663381]  [<ffffffff8024550d>] proc_sched_show_task+0x8bd/0x10e0
[  775.663395]  [<ffffffff8034466e>] sched_show+0x3e/0x80
[  775.663408]  [<ffffffff8031039b>] seq_read+0xdb/0x350
[  775.663421]  [<ffffffff80368776>] ? security_file_permission+0x16/0x20
[  775.663435]  [<ffffffff802f4198>] vfs_read+0xc8/0x170
[  775.663447]  [<ffffffff802f4335>] sys_read+0x55/0x90
[  775.663460]  [<ffffffff8020c67a>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
...

I am running 2.6.28-rc4-00355-g9c7c354 and, after taking a look at the code, it
looks like the problem is in commit 7cbaef9c83e58bbd4bdd534b09052b6c5ec457d5,
where native_sched_clock is modified to use __cycles_2_ns instead of
cycles_2_ns.

-- 
Luis Henriques

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [BUG] using smp_processor_id() in preemptible
  2008-11-15 23:30 [BUG] using smp_processor_id() in preemptible Luis Henriques
@ 2008-11-16  7:10 ` Ingo Molnar
  2008-11-18 11:05   ` Michal Hocko
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2008-11-16  7:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Luis Henriques; +Cc: linux-kernel


* Luis Henriques <henrix@sapo.pt> wrote:

> Hi Ingo,
> 
> while running latencytop, got the following:
> 
> [  775.663239] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: latencytop/6585
> [  775.663303] caller is native_sched_clock+0x3a/0x80
> [  775.663314] Pid: 6585, comm: latencytop Tainted: G        W 2.6.28-rc4-00355-g9c7c354 #1
> [  775.663322] Call Trace:
> [  775.663343]  [<ffffffff803a94e4>] debug_smp_processor_id+0xe4/0xf0
> [  775.663356]  [<ffffffff80213f7a>] native_sched_clock+0x3a/0x80
> [  775.663368]  [<ffffffff80213e19>] sched_clock+0x9/0x10
> [  775.663381]  [<ffffffff8024550d>] proc_sched_show_task+0x8bd/0x10e0
> [  775.663395]  [<ffffffff8034466e>] sched_show+0x3e/0x80
> [  775.663408]  [<ffffffff8031039b>] seq_read+0xdb/0x350
> [  775.663421]  [<ffffffff80368776>] ? security_file_permission+0x16/0x20
> [  775.663435]  [<ffffffff802f4198>] vfs_read+0xc8/0x170
> [  775.663447]  [<ffffffff802f4335>] sys_read+0x55/0x90
> [  775.663460]  [<ffffffff8020c67a>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> ...
> 
> I am running 2.6.28-rc4-00355-g9c7c354 and, after taking a look at 
> the code, it looks like the problem is in commit 
> 7cbaef9c83e58bbd4bdd534b09052b6c5ec457d5, where native_sched_clock 
> is modified to use __cycles_2_ns instead of cycles_2_ns.

indeed. Does the fix below work for you?

Thanks,

	Ingo

-------------->
>From 29d7b90c15035741d15421b36000509212b3e135 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 08:07:15 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] sched: fix kernel warning on /proc/sched_debug access

Luis Henriques reported that with CONFIG_PREEMPT=y + CONFIG_PREEMPT_DEBUG=y +
CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y + CONFIG_LATENCYTOP=y enabled, the following warning
triggers when using latencytop:

> [  775.663239] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: latencytop/6585
> [  775.663303] caller is native_sched_clock+0x3a/0x80
> [  775.663314] Pid: 6585, comm: latencytop Tainted: G        W 2.6.28-rc4-00355-g9c7c354 #1
> [  775.663322] Call Trace:
> [  775.663343]  [<ffffffff803a94e4>] debug_smp_processor_id+0xe4/0xf0
> [  775.663356]  [<ffffffff80213f7a>] native_sched_clock+0x3a/0x80
> [  775.663368]  [<ffffffff80213e19>] sched_clock+0x9/0x10
> [  775.663381]  [<ffffffff8024550d>] proc_sched_show_task+0x8bd/0x10e0
> [  775.663395]  [<ffffffff8034466e>] sched_show+0x3e/0x80
> [  775.663408]  [<ffffffff8031039b>] seq_read+0xdb/0x350
> [  775.663421]  [<ffffffff80368776>] ? security_file_permission+0x16/0x20
> [  775.663435]  [<ffffffff802f4198>] vfs_read+0xc8/0x170
> [  775.663447]  [<ffffffff802f4335>] sys_read+0x55/0x90
> [  775.663460]  [<ffffffff8020c67a>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> ...

This breakage was caused by me via:

  7cbaef9: sched: optimize sched_clock() a bit

Change the calls to cpu_clock().

Reported-by: Luis Henriques <henrix@sapo.pt>
---
 kernel/sched_debug.c |    5 +++--
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched_debug.c b/kernel/sched_debug.c
index 48ecc51..26ed8e3 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_debug.c
@@ -423,10 +423,11 @@ void proc_sched_show_task(struct task_struct *p, struct seq_file *m)
 #undef __P
 
 	{
+		unsigned int this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
 		u64 t0, t1;
 
-		t0 = sched_clock();
-		t1 = sched_clock();
+		t0 = cpu_clock(this_cpu);
+		t1 = cpu_clock(this_cpu);
 		SEQ_printf(m, "%-35s:%21Ld\n",
 			   "clock-delta", (long long)(t1-t0));
 	}


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [BUG] using smp_processor_id() in preemptible
  2008-11-16  7:10 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2008-11-18 11:05   ` Michal Hocko
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michal Hocko @ 2008-11-18 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: Luis Henriques, linux-kernel

On Sun 16-11-08 08:10:59, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Luis Henriques <henrix@sapo.pt> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Ingo,
> > 
> > while running latencytop, got the following:
> > 
> > [  775.663239] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: latencytop/6585
> > [  775.663303] caller is native_sched_clock+0x3a/0x80
> > [  775.663314] Pid: 6585, comm: latencytop Tainted: G        W 2.6.28-rc4-00355-g9c7c354 #1
> > [  775.663322] Call Trace:
> > [  775.663343]  [<ffffffff803a94e4>] debug_smp_processor_id+0xe4/0xf0
> > [  775.663356]  [<ffffffff80213f7a>] native_sched_clock+0x3a/0x80
> > [  775.663368]  [<ffffffff80213e19>] sched_clock+0x9/0x10
> > [  775.663381]  [<ffffffff8024550d>] proc_sched_show_task+0x8bd/0x10e0
> > [  775.663395]  [<ffffffff8034466e>] sched_show+0x3e/0x80
> > [  775.663408]  [<ffffffff8031039b>] seq_read+0xdb/0x350
> > [  775.663421]  [<ffffffff80368776>] ? security_file_permission+0x16/0x20
> > [  775.663435]  [<ffffffff802f4198>] vfs_read+0xc8/0x170
> > [  775.663447]  [<ffffffff802f4335>] sys_read+0x55/0x90
> > [  775.663460]  [<ffffffff8020c67a>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> > ...
> > 
> > I am running 2.6.28-rc4-00355-g9c7c354 and, after taking a look at 
> > the code, it looks like the problem is in commit 
> > 7cbaef9c83e58bbd4bdd534b09052b6c5ec457d5, where native_sched_clock 
> > is modified to use __cycles_2_ns instead of cycles_2_ns.
> 
> indeed. Does the fix below work for you?

Yes, it fixes problem on my end... (reported at
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/997205).

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo
> 
> -------------->
> From 29d7b90c15035741d15421b36000509212b3e135 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 08:07:15 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] sched: fix kernel warning on /proc/sched_debug access
> 
> Luis Henriques reported that with CONFIG_PREEMPT=y + CONFIG_PREEMPT_DEBUG=y +
> CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y + CONFIG_LATENCYTOP=y enabled, the following warning
> triggers when using latencytop:
> 
> > [  775.663239] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: latencytop/6585
> > [  775.663303] caller is native_sched_clock+0x3a/0x80
> > [  775.663314] Pid: 6585, comm: latencytop Tainted: G        W 2.6.28-rc4-00355-g9c7c354 #1
> > [  775.663322] Call Trace:
> > [  775.663343]  [<ffffffff803a94e4>] debug_smp_processor_id+0xe4/0xf0
> > [  775.663356]  [<ffffffff80213f7a>] native_sched_clock+0x3a/0x80
> > [  775.663368]  [<ffffffff80213e19>] sched_clock+0x9/0x10
> > [  775.663381]  [<ffffffff8024550d>] proc_sched_show_task+0x8bd/0x10e0
> > [  775.663395]  [<ffffffff8034466e>] sched_show+0x3e/0x80
> > [  775.663408]  [<ffffffff8031039b>] seq_read+0xdb/0x350
> > [  775.663421]  [<ffffffff80368776>] ? security_file_permission+0x16/0x20
> > [  775.663435]  [<ffffffff802f4198>] vfs_read+0xc8/0x170
> > [  775.663447]  [<ffffffff802f4335>] sys_read+0x55/0x90
> > [  775.663460]  [<ffffffff8020c67a>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> > ...
> 
> This breakage was caused by me via:
> 
>   7cbaef9: sched: optimize sched_clock() a bit
> 
> Change the calls to cpu_clock().
> 
> Reported-by: Luis Henriques <henrix@sapo.pt>

Tested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>

> ---
>  kernel/sched_debug.c |    5 +++--
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_debug.c b/kernel/sched_debug.c
> index 48ecc51..26ed8e3 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_debug.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_debug.c
> @@ -423,10 +423,11 @@ void proc_sched_show_task(struct task_struct *p, struct seq_file *m)
>  #undef __P
>  
>  	{
> +		unsigned int this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
>  		u64 t0, t1;
>  
> -		t0 = sched_clock();
> -		t1 = sched_clock();
> +		t0 = cpu_clock(this_cpu);
> +		t1 = cpu_clock(this_cpu);
>  		SEQ_printf(m, "%-35s:%21Ld\n",
>  			   "clock-delta", (long long)(t1-t0));
>  	}
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-- 
Michal Hocko
L3 team 
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9    
Czech Republic

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-11-18 11:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-11-15 23:30 [BUG] using smp_processor_id() in preemptible Luis Henriques
2008-11-16  7:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-18 11:05   ` Michal Hocko

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox