From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Luis Henriques <henrix@sapo.pt>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] using smp_processor_id() in preemptible
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 08:10:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081116071059.GA19646@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081115233050.GA13439@hades>
* Luis Henriques <henrix@sapo.pt> wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> while running latencytop, got the following:
>
> [ 775.663239] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: latencytop/6585
> [ 775.663303] caller is native_sched_clock+0x3a/0x80
> [ 775.663314] Pid: 6585, comm: latencytop Tainted: G W 2.6.28-rc4-00355-g9c7c354 #1
> [ 775.663322] Call Trace:
> [ 775.663343] [<ffffffff803a94e4>] debug_smp_processor_id+0xe4/0xf0
> [ 775.663356] [<ffffffff80213f7a>] native_sched_clock+0x3a/0x80
> [ 775.663368] [<ffffffff80213e19>] sched_clock+0x9/0x10
> [ 775.663381] [<ffffffff8024550d>] proc_sched_show_task+0x8bd/0x10e0
> [ 775.663395] [<ffffffff8034466e>] sched_show+0x3e/0x80
> [ 775.663408] [<ffffffff8031039b>] seq_read+0xdb/0x350
> [ 775.663421] [<ffffffff80368776>] ? security_file_permission+0x16/0x20
> [ 775.663435] [<ffffffff802f4198>] vfs_read+0xc8/0x170
> [ 775.663447] [<ffffffff802f4335>] sys_read+0x55/0x90
> [ 775.663460] [<ffffffff8020c67a>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> ...
>
> I am running 2.6.28-rc4-00355-g9c7c354 and, after taking a look at
> the code, it looks like the problem is in commit
> 7cbaef9c83e58bbd4bdd534b09052b6c5ec457d5, where native_sched_clock
> is modified to use __cycles_2_ns instead of cycles_2_ns.
indeed. Does the fix below work for you?
Thanks,
Ingo
-------------->
>From 29d7b90c15035741d15421b36000509212b3e135 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 08:07:15 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] sched: fix kernel warning on /proc/sched_debug access
Luis Henriques reported that with CONFIG_PREEMPT=y + CONFIG_PREEMPT_DEBUG=y +
CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y + CONFIG_LATENCYTOP=y enabled, the following warning
triggers when using latencytop:
> [ 775.663239] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: latencytop/6585
> [ 775.663303] caller is native_sched_clock+0x3a/0x80
> [ 775.663314] Pid: 6585, comm: latencytop Tainted: G W 2.6.28-rc4-00355-g9c7c354 #1
> [ 775.663322] Call Trace:
> [ 775.663343] [<ffffffff803a94e4>] debug_smp_processor_id+0xe4/0xf0
> [ 775.663356] [<ffffffff80213f7a>] native_sched_clock+0x3a/0x80
> [ 775.663368] [<ffffffff80213e19>] sched_clock+0x9/0x10
> [ 775.663381] [<ffffffff8024550d>] proc_sched_show_task+0x8bd/0x10e0
> [ 775.663395] [<ffffffff8034466e>] sched_show+0x3e/0x80
> [ 775.663408] [<ffffffff8031039b>] seq_read+0xdb/0x350
> [ 775.663421] [<ffffffff80368776>] ? security_file_permission+0x16/0x20
> [ 775.663435] [<ffffffff802f4198>] vfs_read+0xc8/0x170
> [ 775.663447] [<ffffffff802f4335>] sys_read+0x55/0x90
> [ 775.663460] [<ffffffff8020c67a>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> ...
This breakage was caused by me via:
7cbaef9: sched: optimize sched_clock() a bit
Change the calls to cpu_clock().
Reported-by: Luis Henriques <henrix@sapo.pt>
---
kernel/sched_debug.c | 5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched_debug.c b/kernel/sched_debug.c
index 48ecc51..26ed8e3 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_debug.c
@@ -423,10 +423,11 @@ void proc_sched_show_task(struct task_struct *p, struct seq_file *m)
#undef __P
{
+ unsigned int this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
u64 t0, t1;
- t0 = sched_clock();
- t1 = sched_clock();
+ t0 = cpu_clock(this_cpu);
+ t1 = cpu_clock(this_cpu);
SEQ_printf(m, "%-35s:%21Ld\n",
"clock-delta", (long long)(t1-t0));
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-16 7:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-15 23:30 [BUG] using smp_processor_id() in preemptible Luis Henriques
2008-11-16 7:10 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-11-18 11:05 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081116071059.GA19646@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=henrix@sapo.pt \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox