From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>
Subject: [patch 2.6.28-rc5] regulator: enable/disable refcounting
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 11:44:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200811161144.46582.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
From: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Make the <linux/regulator.h> framework treat enable/disable call
pairs like the <linux/clk.h> and <linux/interrupt.h> frameworks do:
they're refcounted, so that different parts of a driver don't need
to put work into coordination that frameworks normally handle.
It's a minor object code shrink.
It also makes the regulator_is_disabled() kerneldoc say what it's
actually returning: return value is not a refcount, and may report
an error (e.g. I/O error from I2C).
It also fixes some minor regulator_put() goofage: removing unlocked
access to the enable state. (But still not making regulator put/get
match the refcounting pattern they invoke.)
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ struct regulator {
int uA_load;
int min_uV;
int max_uV;
- int enabled; /* client has called enabled */
+ int enabled; /* count of client enables */
char *supply_name;
struct device_attribute dev_attr;
struct regulator_dev *rdev;
@@ -933,16 +933,13 @@ void regulator_put(struct regulator *reg
if (regulator == NULL || IS_ERR(regulator))
return;
- if (regulator->enabled) {
- printk(KERN_WARNING "Releasing supply %s while enabled\n",
- regulator->supply_name);
- WARN_ON(regulator->enabled);
- regulator_disable(regulator);
- }
-
mutex_lock(®ulator_list_mutex);
rdev = regulator->rdev;
+ if (WARN(regulator->enabled, "Releasing supply %s while enabled\n",
+ regulator->supply_name))
+ _regulator_disable(rdev);
+
/* remove any sysfs entries */
if (regulator->dev) {
sysfs_remove_link(&rdev->dev.kobj, regulator->supply_name);
@@ -1012,21 +1009,17 @@ static int _regulator_enable(struct regu
*/
int regulator_enable(struct regulator *regulator)
{
- int ret;
-
- if (regulator->enabled) {
- printk(KERN_CRIT "Regulator %s already enabled\n",
- regulator->supply_name);
- WARN_ON(regulator->enabled);
- return 0;
- }
+ struct regulator_dev *rdev = regulator->rdev;
+ int ret = 0;
- mutex_lock(®ulator->rdev->mutex);
- regulator->enabled = 1;
- ret = _regulator_enable(regulator->rdev);
- if (ret != 0)
- regulator->enabled = 0;
- mutex_unlock(®ulator->rdev->mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&rdev->mutex);
+ if (regulator->enabled == 0)
+ ret = _regulator_enable(rdev);
+ else if (regulator->enabled < 0)
+ ret = -EIO;
+ if (ret == 0)
+ regulator->enabled++;
+ mutex_unlock(&rdev->mutex);
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(regulator_enable);
@@ -1078,19 +1071,21 @@ static int _regulator_disable(struct reg
*/
int regulator_disable(struct regulator *regulator)
{
- int ret;
-
- if (!regulator->enabled) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "%s: not in use by this consumer\n",
- __func__);
- return 0;
- }
+ struct regulator_dev *rdev = regulator->rdev;
+ int ret = 0;
- mutex_lock(®ulator->rdev->mutex);
- regulator->enabled = 0;
- regulator->uA_load = 0;
- ret = _regulator_disable(regulator->rdev);
- mutex_unlock(®ulator->rdev->mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&rdev->mutex);
+ if (regulator->enabled == 1) {
+ ret = _regulator_disable(rdev);
+ if (ret == 0)
+ regulator->uA_load = 0;
+ } else if (WARN(regulator->enabled <= 0,
+ "unbalanced disables for supply %s\n",
+ regulator->supply_name))
+ ret = -EIO;
+ if (ret == 0)
+ regulator->enabled--;
+ mutex_unlock(&rdev->mutex);
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(regulator_disable);
@@ -1166,7 +1161,13 @@ out:
* regulator_is_enabled - is the regulator output enabled
* @regulator: regulator source
*
- * Returns zero for disabled otherwise return number of enable requests.
+ * Returns positive if the regulator driver backing the source/client
+ * has requested that the device be enabled, zero if it hasn't, else a
+ * negative errno code.
+ *
+ * Note that the device backing this regulator handle can have multiple
+ * users, so it might be enabled even if regulator_enable() was never
+ * called for this particular source.
*/
int regulator_is_enabled(struct regulator *regulator)
{
next reply other threads:[~2008-11-16 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-16 19:44 David Brownell [this message]
2008-11-17 15:16 ` [patch 2.6.28-rc5] regulator: enable/disable refcounting Mark Brown
2008-11-17 16:21 ` David Brownell
2008-11-17 16:46 ` Liam Girdwood
2008-11-19 21:26 ` Liam Girdwood
2008-11-19 22:12 ` David Brownell
2008-11-20 21:58 ` Liam Girdwood
2008-11-20 22:05 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200811161144.46582.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=broonie@sirena.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrg@slimlogic.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox