From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755281AbYKPWKr (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:10:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753678AbYKPWKg (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:10:36 -0500 Received: from vena.lwn.net ([206.168.112.25]:58246 "EHLO vena.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753511AbYKPWKf (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:10:35 -0500 Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:10:19 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet To: "=?UTF-8?B?RnLDqWTDqXJpYw==?= Weisbecker" Cc: "Ingo Molnar" , "Steven Rostedt" , "Linux Kernel" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] tracing/branch-tracer: Fix a trace recursion on branch tracer Message-ID: <20081116151019.5ee745f6@tpl> In-Reply-To: References: <491FA8C8.1040905@gmail.com> <20081116062213.GA32215@elte.hu> <20081116064948.GD32215@elte.hu> Organization: LWN.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.14.4; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:01:24 +0100 "Frédéric Weisbecker" wrote: > Ok. Yeah I had some trouble with this "impact" tag, finding it hard to > not overlap its message with this of the patch's subject but I better > understand now... > Perhaps this tag should be explained in > Documentation/development-process/5.Posting and SubmittingPatches... > (cc-ed Jonathan for the development-process documents).... I'll happily do so. I will confess, though, that I don't really understand how that tag differs from the information which simply belongs in the patch title and changelog. jon