public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	Doug Chapman <doug.chapman@hp.com>,
	mingo@elte.hu, adobriyan@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: regression introduced by - timers: fix itimer/many thread hang
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:36:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081117143623.GA4658@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081114164155.GA7738@redhat.com>

On 11/14, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Currently I am trying to find the ugly, but simple fixes for 2.6.28.
>
> account_group_user_time(), run_posix_cpu_timers() are simpler to
> fix. Again, I need to actually read the code, but afaics we can
> rely on the fact that the task is current, so we can change the
> code
>
> 	-	if (!->signal)
> 	+	if (->exit_state)
> 			return;

Yes, unless I missed something again, this should work. I'll send
the (simple) patches soon, but I have no idea how to test them.


However, I'm afraid there is another problem. On 32 bit cpus we can't
read "u64 sum_exec_runtime" atomically, and so thread_group_cputime()
can "overestimate" ->sum_exec_runtime by (up to) UINT_MAX if it races
with the thread which updates its per_cpu_ptr(.totals). This for example
means that check_process_timers() can fire the CPUCLOCK_SCHED timers
before time.

No?

Oleg.


  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-17 13:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1224694989.8431.23.camel@oberon>
     [not found] ` <1225132746.14792.13.camel@bobble.smo.corp.google.com>
     [not found]   ` <1225219114.24204.37.camel@oberon>
2008-11-06  1:58     ` regression introduced by - timers: fix itimer/many thread hang Frank Mayhar
2008-11-06 11:03       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-06 15:03         ` Christoph Lameter
2008-11-06 15:08           ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-06 16:08             ` Christoph Lameter
2008-11-06 23:52             ` Frank Mayhar
2008-11-07  8:35               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-07 10:29               ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-07 18:10                 ` Frank Mayhar
2008-11-07 20:26                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-10 14:38                     ` Christoph Lameter
2008-11-10 14:42                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-10 15:41                         ` Christoph Lameter
2008-11-10 18:00                         ` Frank Mayhar
2008-11-14  2:42                           ` Roland McGrath
2008-11-14 16:41                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-11-17 14:36                               ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2008-11-17 18:16                                 ` Roland McGrath
2008-11-17 22:18                                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-11-17 21:49                                     ` Roland McGrath
2008-11-11  0:20                         ` Ingo Oeser
2008-11-11 13:58                           ` Christoph Lameter
2008-11-21 18:42                 ` Petr Tesarik
2008-11-21 19:26                   ` Frank Mayhar
2008-11-23 14:24                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-24  8:46                     ` Petr Tesarik
2008-11-24  9:33                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-24 12:32                         ` Petr Tesarik
2008-11-24 12:59                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-24 16:06                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-06 16:31         ` [PATCH] revert: " Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-06 21:44           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-06 21:53             ` Christoph Lameter
2008-11-07 10:19               ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-13 16:00           ` Doug Chapman
2008-11-13 16:08             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-14 14:10               ` Doug Chapman
     [not found] <20081105191211.c0316b94.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2008-11-06 12:59 ` regression introduced by - " Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081117143623.GA4658@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=doug.chapman@hp.com \
    --cc=fmayhar@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox