From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com>,
Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@clustcom.com>,
Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com>,
dougthompson@xmission.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ktaka@clustcom.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] edac x38: new MC driver module
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:16:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081118121620.GB8625@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081109112646.97c594b5.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 11:26:46AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Perhaps it would be better to have a CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_READQ and to then
> disable these drivers on the architectures which don't provide
> readq/writeq support.
And we also need to define the exact semantics. Questions coming to mind:
o are implementations performing 2 32-bit accesses acceptable?
o if so, what ordering for the two accesses is acceptable?
Ralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-18 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-17 21:39 [PATCH 1/1] edac x38: new MC driver module dougthompson
2008-10-20 23:32 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-05 22:29 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2008-11-05 16:26 ` Doug Thompson
2008-11-07 0:46 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-07 15:28 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2008-11-07 6:31 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-07 15:38 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2008-11-07 7:11 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-09 15:10 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2008-11-09 19:26 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-11 6:11 ` Paul Mundt
2008-11-13 15:15 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2008-11-18 12:16 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2008-11-18 12:32 ` Russell King
2008-11-20 16:19 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2008-11-23 23:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-24 17:18 ` Luck, Tony
2008-11-24 18:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-25 2:55 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2008-11-25 5:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-25 15:30 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2008-11-25 15:46 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-11-25 16:10 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2008-11-29 0:11 ` Hitoshi Mitake
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-11-29 0:56 H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-29 7:47 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2008-11-29 9:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-29 10:26 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2008-11-29 10:52 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-11-29 13:24 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2008-11-29 18:01 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-11-30 8:16 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2008-11-30 8:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-30 9:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-30 15:20 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2008-11-30 16:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-01 13:51 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2008-12-01 13:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-01 23:58 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2008-12-04 15:58 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-01-16 1:24 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-02-21 10:11 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-02-21 10:39 ` Russell King
2009-02-21 13:09 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-22 14:15 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-02-22 14:16 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-02-22 14:18 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-02-22 14:19 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-02-22 14:20 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-02-22 14:21 ` Hitoshi Mitake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081118121620.GB8625@linux-mips.org \
--to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dougthompson@xmission.com \
--cc=h.mitake@gmail.com \
--cc=ktaka@clustcom.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mitake@clustcom.com \
--cc=norsk5@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox