From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754170AbYKRVD6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:03:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752760AbYKRVDu (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:03:50 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:39335 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752366AbYKRVDt (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:03:49 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:03:44 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= Weisbecker Cc: Steven Rostedt , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] tracing/function-return-tracer: add the overrun field Message-ID: <20081118210344.GC11490@elte.hu> References: <20081118084755.GK17838@elte.hu> <20081118145154.GC30358@elte.hu> <20081118151326.GH30358@elte.hu> <20081118155045.GJ30358@elte.hu> <20081118164019.GA18620@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE RBL: Envelope sender in blackholes.securitysage.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Frédéric Weisbecker wrote: > 2008/11/18 Ingo Molnar : > > Would be nice to have the dynamic allocation straight away > > 2008/11/18 Steven Rostedt : > > I would recommend using a static array > > :-) hey, look at the bright side of it: whichever variant you pick, if it goes wrong, you'll always have someone else to blame for that unbelievably stupid suggestion ;-) Ingo