The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: ?ric Piel <eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, trenn@suse.de, rpurdie@rpsys.net,
	hmh@hmh.eng.br
Subject: Re: HP accelerometer: split chip handling from HP ACPI interface
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:21:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081122122149.GA1794@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <492757A8.6010509@tremplin-utc.net>

On Sat 2008-11-22 01:51:52, ?ric Piel wrote:
> Éric Piel schreef:
> > Andrew Morton schreef:
> >> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:21:21 +0100
> >> Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> wrote:
> >>
> >>> This patch splits handling between chip-specific lis3lv02d and HP/ACPI
> >>> specific hp_accel.c.
> >> umm, so?  What reason does anyone have for applying it?
> > Here is the log I have for the (old version) of pavel's patch:
> > 
> > The sensor can be accessed via various buses. In particular, SPI, I?C
> > and, on HP laptops, via a specific ACPI API (the only one currently
> > supported). Separate this latest platform from the core of the sensor
> > driver to allow support for the other bus type. The second, and more
> > direct goal is actually to be able to merge this part with the
> > hp-disk-leds driver, which has the same ACPI PNP number.
> > 
> > 
> > I'll try to follow with a patch doing the merge of the hp-disk-leds
> > driver, so that everything makes sense...
>
> Actually, I mistook, Pavel also included some led stuff in this patch.
> That doesn't look right, especially as the led driver is not
>removed!

I was simply planning to remove the LED stuff in the followup patch. I
guess I should have mentioned that in the changelog...

								Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-11-22 12:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-21 21:21 HP accelerometer: split chip handling from HP ACPI interface Pavel Machek
2008-11-22  0:00 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-22  0:25   ` Éric Piel
2008-11-22  0:51     ` Éric Piel
2008-11-22  0:55       ` [PATCH 1/2] LIS3LV02D: separate the core from HP ACPI API Éric Piel
2008-11-22 12:35         ` Pavel Machek
2008-11-22 14:28           ` Éric Piel
2008-11-22  0:55       ` [PATCH 2/2] LIS3LV02D: Merge with leds-hp-disk Éric Piel
2008-11-22 12:21       ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2008-11-22  0:58 ` HP accelerometer: split chip handling from HP ACPI interface Andrew Morton
2008-11-28  8:22 ` HP accelerometer: free fall detection working, testers wanted Pavel Machek
2008-11-28 10:02   ` Éric Piel
2008-11-28 10:44     ` Pavel Machek
2008-11-30 22:16       ` Éric Piel
2008-12-01 11:55         ` Thomas Renninger
2008-12-01 12:03           ` Éric Piel
2009-01-09 10:13         ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081122122149.GA1794@ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net \
    --cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rpurdie@rpsys.net \
    --cc=trenn@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox