public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@mailshack.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC -tip] x86: introduce ENTRY(KPROBE)_X86  assembly helpers to catch unbalanced declaration
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:10:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081124091031.GA8187@mailshack.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081123194828.GQ12710@localhost>

On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 10:48:28PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> [Ingo Molnar - Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 08:31:34PM +0100]
> ...
> | > 
> | > Just got an error in implementation -- we have to support nested
> | > ENTRY without problem. Will check. What a surprise :-)
> | 
> | do you mean:
> | 
> |   ENTRY(system_call)
> |   ENTRY(system_call_after_swapgs)
> |   ...
> |   END(system_call)
> | 
> | that's more of a bug - system_call_after_swapgs is not a real entry 
> | point, we just need the label of it. Perhaps something like __ENTRY() 
> | for that case would be enough.
> | 
> | nor is this one real:
> | 
> |   ENTRY(interrupt)
> |   ENTRY(irq_entries_start)
> |   ...
> |   END(irq_entries_start)
> |   END(interrupt)
> | 
> | do we really need .irq_entries_start?
> | 
> | I think in general we should define a flat hierarchy of entries.
> | 
> | 	Ingo
> | 
> 
> Yeah, I meant these cases. I don't think we really need irq_entries_start
> (didn't find any mention of them in tree). In case of system_call_after_swapgs
> I'm not that sure, but since xen use it as a plain jmp (at least now) it
> could be converted to a plain label. Ingo, I'll continue tomorrow evening --
> have some other things to be done :)

The problem is that ENTRY(interrupt) is done in init.rodata, and
ENTRY(irq_entries_start) is done in .text. So inside the .S-file,
they are nested, but in the .o-file they are separate. Instead of
removing ENTRY(irq_entries_start), I think we should just expand to:


	.section .init.rodata,"a"
	.p2align 5
	.global interrupt
interrupt:

and

	size interrupt, .-interrupt

But the only importance I can think of is that this keeps both
the "interrupt" array and irq_entries_start visible in debugging
information.

Alternatively, we could probably do away with the interrupt
array entirely. We _know_ how the irq stubs are structured and
irq_entries_start is in principle enough information to reconstruct
all information in interrupt.

Anyhow, I too think that supporting nested ENTRY/END in .S files is
unnecessary.

Alexander

> 		- Cyrill -

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-11-24  9:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-23 16:57 [RFC -tip] x86: introduce ENTRY(KPROBE)_X86 assembly helpers to catch unbalanced declaration Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-11-23 17:00 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-11-23 17:51 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-11-23 17:58   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-11-23 18:10     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-11-23 18:12     ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-11-23 18:21       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-11-23 18:43         ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-11-23 18:46         ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-11-23 18:54         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-23 18:57           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-11-23 19:00             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-23 19:04               ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-11-23 19:22               ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-11-23 19:31                 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-23 19:48                   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-11-23 22:35                     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-24  9:10                     ` Alexander van Heukelum [this message]
2008-11-24 18:04                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-23 19:51           ` Sam Ravnborg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081124091031.GA8187@mailshack.com \
    --to=heukelum@mailshack.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox