From: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@mailshack.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC -tip] x86: introduce ENTRY(KPROBE)_X86 assembly helpers to catch unbalanced declaration
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:10:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081124091031.GA8187@mailshack.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081123194828.GQ12710@localhost>
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 10:48:28PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> [Ingo Molnar - Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 08:31:34PM +0100]
> ...
> | >
> | > Just got an error in implementation -- we have to support nested
> | > ENTRY without problem. Will check. What a surprise :-)
> |
> | do you mean:
> |
> | ENTRY(system_call)
> | ENTRY(system_call_after_swapgs)
> | ...
> | END(system_call)
> |
> | that's more of a bug - system_call_after_swapgs is not a real entry
> | point, we just need the label of it. Perhaps something like __ENTRY()
> | for that case would be enough.
> |
> | nor is this one real:
> |
> | ENTRY(interrupt)
> | ENTRY(irq_entries_start)
> | ...
> | END(irq_entries_start)
> | END(interrupt)
> |
> | do we really need .irq_entries_start?
> |
> | I think in general we should define a flat hierarchy of entries.
> |
> | Ingo
> |
>
> Yeah, I meant these cases. I don't think we really need irq_entries_start
> (didn't find any mention of them in tree). In case of system_call_after_swapgs
> I'm not that sure, but since xen use it as a plain jmp (at least now) it
> could be converted to a plain label. Ingo, I'll continue tomorrow evening --
> have some other things to be done :)
The problem is that ENTRY(interrupt) is done in init.rodata, and
ENTRY(irq_entries_start) is done in .text. So inside the .S-file,
they are nested, but in the .o-file they are separate. Instead of
removing ENTRY(irq_entries_start), I think we should just expand to:
.section .init.rodata,"a"
.p2align 5
.global interrupt
interrupt:
and
size interrupt, .-interrupt
But the only importance I can think of is that this keeps both
the "interrupt" array and irq_entries_start visible in debugging
information.
Alternatively, we could probably do away with the interrupt
array entirely. We _know_ how the irq stubs are structured and
irq_entries_start is in principle enough information to reconstruct
all information in interrupt.
Anyhow, I too think that supporting nested ENTRY/END in .S files is
unnecessary.
Alexander
> - Cyrill -
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-24 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-23 16:57 [RFC -tip] x86: introduce ENTRY(KPROBE)_X86 assembly helpers to catch unbalanced declaration Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-11-23 17:00 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-11-23 17:51 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-11-23 17:58 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-11-23 18:10 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-11-23 18:12 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-11-23 18:21 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-11-23 18:43 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-11-23 18:46 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-11-23 18:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-23 18:57 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-11-23 19:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-23 19:04 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-11-23 19:22 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-11-23 19:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-23 19:48 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-11-23 22:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-24 9:10 ` Alexander van Heukelum [this message]
2008-11-24 18:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-23 19:51 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081124091031.GA8187@mailshack.com \
--to=heukelum@mailshack.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox