From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754132AbYKYEvb (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:51:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753205AbYKYEvW (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:51:22 -0500 Received: from blaine.gmane.org ([80.91.229.8]:57396 "EHLO hugh.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753188AbYKYEvW (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:51:22 -0500 Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:20:51 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , public-linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@hugh.gmane.org Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] USB fixes for 2.6.28-git Message-ID: <20081125042051.GA17345@suse.de> References: <20081120055026.GA10709@kroah.com> <20081120214826.GA15769@suse.de> <7vprkklaob.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vprkklaob.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-TMDA-Confirmed: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 05:51:10 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 07:57:40PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > Greg KH writes: > > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 01:23:51PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Wed, 19 Nov 2008, Greg KH wrote: > >> > > >> > Please pull from: > >> > master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb-2.6.git/ > >> > >> "Already up-to-date". > >> > >> I think you forgot to actually push them out. > > > > Crap, you're right, they are now there, sorry about that. > > I've been wondering if git can do something to avoid things like this. > > For example, if you push into a particular branch of a particular > repository _only_ to ask Linus to pull and for no other purpose, one > possible solution may be to trigger a hook on the receiving end of your > push (i.e. the public repository Linus is asked to pull from) to send out > the "Please pull from" message (I presume this would be a no-go as there > is not much room for you to customize the message). > > Alternatively, we may want to give an option to git-request-pull to > actually run "git push" to the destination. > > Thoughts? Is it "none of Git's business"? In this case, it was just my fault. I just forgot to push the tree. I have my own scripts that I use to create my "please pull" message, that don't really tie into git's infrastructure and I don't know if I would want them to either. thanks, greg k-h