From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752792AbYKYIGq (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:06:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751000AbYKYIGi (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:06:38 -0500 Received: from pasmtpa.tele.dk ([80.160.77.114]:60862 "EHLO pasmtpA.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751029AbYKYIGi (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:06:38 -0500 Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:04:39 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Wu Fengguang Cc: LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] don't take lock on changing ra_pages Message-ID: <20081125080438.GQ26308@kernel.dk> References: <20081123101907.GA12218@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081123101907.GA12218@localhost> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Nov 23 2008, Wu Fengguang wrote: > There's no need to take queue_lock or kernel_lock when modifying > bdi->ra_pages. So remove them. Also remove out of date comment for > queue_max_sectors_store(). Thanks, applied to for-2.6.29. -- Jens Axboe