From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] sched: prevent divide by zero error in cpu_avg_load_per_task
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:29:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081127092941.GA630@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081127020554.533035163@goodmis.org>
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>
> Impact: fix to divide by zero
>
> While testing the branch profiler, I hit this crash:
>
> divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> [...]
> Call Trace:
> <IRQ> <0> [<ffffffff8024fd43>] find_busiest_group+0x3e5/0xcaa
> [<ffffffff8025da75>] rebalance_domains+0x2da/0xa21
> The code for cpu_avg_load_per_task has:
>
> if (rq->nr_running)
> rq->avg_load_per_task = rq->load.weight / rq->nr_running;
>
> The runqueue lock is not held here, and there is nothing that
> prevents the rq->nr_running from going to zero after it passes the
> if condition.
>
> The branch profiler simply made the race window bigger.
>
> This patch saves off the rq->nr_running to a local variable and uses
> that for both the condition and the division.
good catch! Applied to tip/sched/urgent, thanks Steve!
the rebalancer scans remote runqueues without holding the runqueue
lock for performance reasons, so nr_running indeed has to be loaded
into a local variable here.
I think it could hit anywhere upstream as well, even without the
branch tracer: depends on the register pressure and GCC's choices for
reloading that register. If say FRAME_POINTER is enabled and we are
running with some more agressive optimization or just an older/suckier
GCC that does a spurious reload, then this might happen too.
it's not a classic race, it's an SMP bug that will either trigger or
not trigger at all, depending on compiler behavior.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-27 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-27 2:04 [PATCH 0/1] sched: divide by 0 error Steven Rostedt
2008-11-27 2:04 ` [PATCH 1/1] sched: prevent divide by zero error in cpu_avg_load_per_task Steven Rostedt
2008-11-27 9:29 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-11-29 19:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-11-29 19:50 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081127092941.GA630@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox