public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] sched: prevent divide by zero error in cpu_avg_load_per_task
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:29:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081127092941.GA630@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081127020554.533035163@goodmis.org>


* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> 
> Impact: fix to divide by zero
> 
> While testing the branch profiler, I hit this crash:
> 
> divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> [...]
> Call Trace:
>  <IRQ> <0> [<ffffffff8024fd43>] find_busiest_group+0x3e5/0xcaa
>  [<ffffffff8025da75>] rebalance_domains+0x2da/0xa21

> The code for cpu_avg_load_per_task has:
> 
> 	if (rq->nr_running)
> 		rq->avg_load_per_task = rq->load.weight / rq->nr_running;
> 
> The runqueue lock is not held here, and there is nothing that 
> prevents the rq->nr_running from going to zero after it passes the 
> if condition.
> 
> The branch profiler simply made the race window bigger.
> 
> This patch saves off the rq->nr_running to a local variable and uses 
> that for both the condition and the division.

good catch! Applied to tip/sched/urgent, thanks Steve!

the rebalancer scans remote runqueues without holding the runqueue 
lock for performance reasons, so nr_running indeed has to be loaded 
into a local variable here.

I think it could hit anywhere upstream as well, even without the 
branch tracer: depends on the register pressure and GCC's choices for 
reloading that register. If say FRAME_POINTER is enabled and we are 
running with some more agressive optimization or just an older/suckier 
GCC that does a spurious reload, then this might happen too.

it's not a classic race, it's an SMP bug that will either trigger or 
not trigger at all, depending on compiler behavior.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-27  9:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-27  2:04 [PATCH 0/1] sched: divide by 0 error Steven Rostedt
2008-11-27  2:04 ` [PATCH 1/1] sched: prevent divide by zero error in cpu_avg_load_per_task Steven Rostedt
2008-11-27  9:29   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-11-29 19:19   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-11-29 19:50     ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081127092941.GA630@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox