From: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mmotm 2008-11-26-17-00 uploaded (hwmon / dev_attr_name)
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 14:56:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081201135634.GC6932@gundam.enneenne.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081130215350.b63ed292.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 09:53:50PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:25:13 -0800 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 21:01:29 -0800 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:
> > >>> The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2008-11-26-17-00 has been uploaded to
> > >>>
> > >>> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
> > >>
> > >> I'm getting lots of these build errors:
> > >>
> > >> drivers/hwmon/built-in.o:(.data+0x7c70): multiple definition of `dev_attr_name'
> > >
> > > -ENOREPRODUCE. What config?
> >
> > Could be some kind of tools issue, I suppose.
> >
> > config attached.
>
> OK, it was a couple of instances of
>
> DEVICE_ATTR(name, ...)
>
> (in hwmon and pps) which both emitted a global symbol dev_attr_name, so
> the linker got upset.
>
> This happens a lot. Because it's a pukey macro, people don't realise
> that it's declaring storage and they don't think to make it static. It
> would be good to do a tree-wide grep for non-static DEVICE_ATTRs and
> fix them up where possible.
>
>
> Rodolfo, I fixed pps this way:
This is not correct, the right patch is:
diff --git a/drivers/pps/sysfs.c b/drivers/pps/sysfs.c
index 99528a8..7c2b0c4 100644
--- a/drivers/pps/sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/pps/sysfs.c
@@ -41,7 +41,6 @@ static ssize_t pps_show_assert(struct device *dev,
(long long) pps->assert_tu.sec,
pps->assert_tu.nsec,
pps->assert_sequence);
}
-DEVICE_ATTR(assert, S_IRUGO, pps_show_assert, NULL);
static ssize_t pps_show_clear(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char
*buf)
@@ -55,7 +54,6 @@ static ssize_t pps_show_clear(struct device *dev,
(long long) pps->clear_tu.sec,
pps->clear_tu.nsec,
pps->clear_sequence);
}
-DEVICE_ATTR(clear, S_IRUGO, pps_show_clear, NULL);
static ssize_t pps_show_mode(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char
*buf)
@@ -64,7 +62,6 @@ static ssize_t pps_show_mode(struct device *dev,
return sprintf(buf, "%4x\n", pps->info.mode);
}
-DEVICE_ATTR(mode, S_IRUGO, pps_show_mode, NULL);
static ssize_t pps_show_echo(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char
*buf)
@@ -73,7 +70,6 @@ static ssize_t pps_show_echo(struct device *dev,
return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", !!pps->info.echo);
}
-DEVICE_ATTR(echo, S_IRUGO, pps_show_echo, NULL);
static ssize_t pps_show_name(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char
*buf)
@@ -82,7 +78,6 @@ static ssize_t pps_show_name(struct device *dev,
return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", pps->info.name);
}
-DEVICE_ATTR(name, S_IRUGO, pps_show_name, NULL);
static ssize_t pps_show_path(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char
*buf)
@@ -91,7 +86,6 @@ static ssize_t pps_show_path(struct device *dev,
return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", pps->info.path);
}
-DEVICE_ATTR(path, S_IRUGO, pps_show_path, NULL);
struct device_attribute pps_attrs[] = {
__ATTR(assert, S_IRUGO, pps_show_assert, NULL),
We can just remove the DEVICE_ATTR(name, ...) since all the variables
are into pps_attrs[].
Please, let me know if you wish a proper patch for this or you can do
it by yourself.
> and the x86_64 build got noisier:
>
> drivers/pps/sysfs.c:44: warning: 'dev_attr_assert' defined but not used
> drivers/pps/sysfs.c:58: warning: 'dev_attr_clear' defined but not used
> drivers/pps/sysfs.c:67: warning: 'dev_attr_mode' defined but not used
> drivers/pps/sysfs.c:76: warning: 'dev_attr_echo' defined but not used
> drivers/pps/sysfs.c:85: warning: 'dev_attr_name' defined but not used
> drivers/pps/sysfs.c:94: warning: 'dev_attr_path' defined but not used
This will be fixed by the above patch.
> drivers/pps/clients/pps-ldisc.c: In function 'pps_tty_dcd_change':
> drivers/pps/clients/pps-ldisc.c:32: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size
> drivers/pps/clients/pps-ldisc.c: In function 'pps_tty_open':
> drivers/pps/clients/pps-ldisc.c:77: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size
> drivers/pps/clients/pps-ldisc.c:82: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size
> drivers/pps/clients/pps-ldisc.c: In function 'pps_tty_close':
> drivers/pps/clients/pps-ldisc.c:91: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size
>
>
> For the ->disc_data warnings you could perhaps just make all the
> relevant scalar types `long', not `int'.
But doing like this will breaks 32bit archs... =:-o
Ciao,
Rodolfo
--
GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: giometti@enneenne.com
Linux Device Driver giometti@linux.it
Embedded Systems phone: +39 349 2432127
UNIX programming skype: rodolfo.giometti
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-01 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200811270101.mAR114rp016378@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
2008-11-28 13:09 ` mmotm 2008-11-26-17-00 uploaded Tetsuo Handa
2008-11-28 19:42 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-03 15:52 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-12-03 21:42 ` Tetsuo Handa
2008-11-29 4:57 ` mmotm 2008-11-26-17-00 uploaded (backlight) Randy Dunlap
2008-11-29 5:01 ` mmotm 2008-11-26-17-00 uploaded (hwmon / dev_attr_name) Randy Dunlap
2008-11-29 6:06 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-29 17:25 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-12-01 5:53 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-01 13:56 ` Rodolfo Giometti [this message]
2008-12-01 18:37 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-02 10:13 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2008-12-02 10:56 ` [PATCH] pps sysfs: not needed variables removed Rodolfo Giometti
2008-12-02 10:56 ` [PATCH] pps ldisc: avoid noisy compilation on 64bits architecture Rodolfo Giometti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081201135634.GC6932@gundam.enneenne.com \
--to=giometti@enneenne.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox