From: Bastian Blank <bastian@waldi.eu.org>
To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: oleg@redhat.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, roland@redhat.com,
containers@lists.osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
xemul@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] Protect cinit from fatal signals
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 13:06:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081202120606.GD1132@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081201202112.GC12493@us.ibm.com>
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 12:21:12PM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> Container-inits are special in some ways and this change requires SIGKILL
> to terminate them.
No. They have are not special from the outside namespace.
Also it was discussed to use pid namespaces to preserve the local pid of
a process during snapshot/restore. This means that every process may get
the state of a container-init. And then it is not longer a wise idea to
make them behave different from the outside.
Bastian
--
I'm a soldier, not a diplomat. I can only tell the truth.
-- Kirk, "Errand of Mercy", stardate 3198.9
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-02 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-26 3:42 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Container init signal semantics Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-11-26 3:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] pid: Implement ns_of_pid Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-11-27 1:19 ` Bastian Blank
2008-12-01 20:24 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-02 11:58 ` Bastian Blank
2008-12-02 22:12 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-03 0:34 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-11-26 3:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] pid: Generalize task_active_pid_ns Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-11-27 1:17 ` Bastian Blank
2008-11-27 21:19 ` Greg Kurz
2008-12-01 21:15 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-02 11:57 ` Bastian Blank
2008-12-03 7:41 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-04 12:58 ` Bastian Blank
2008-11-27 13:09 ` Nadia Derbey
2008-12-01 20:38 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-11-26 3:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] Determine if sender is from ancestor ns Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-11-27 1:01 ` Bastian Blank
2008-12-01 20:15 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-02 11:48 ` Bastian Blank
2008-12-02 19:59 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-04 12:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] Determine if sender is from ancestor ns+ Bastian Blank
2008-12-02 3:07 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] Determine if sender is from ancestor ns Roland McGrath
2008-12-04 1:06 ` Roland McGrath
2008-12-09 3:22 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-11-26 3:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] Protect cinit from fatal signals Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-11-27 1:07 ` Bastian Blank
2008-12-01 20:21 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-02 12:06 ` Bastian Blank [this message]
2008-12-02 20:51 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-04 12:52 ` Bastian Blank
2008-12-04 18:58 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-11-26 3:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/5] Clear si_pid for signal from ancestor ns Sukadev Bhattiprolu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081202120606.GD1132@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org \
--to=bastian@waldi.eu.org \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox