public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Cc: Gian Lorenzo Meocci <glmeocci@gmail.com>,
	ltt-dev@lists.casi.polymtl.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"K.Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [ltt-dev] trace a futex
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 00:26:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081203052640.GA13701@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4935B25F.7010701@web.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1979 bytes --]

* Jan Kiszka (jan.kiszka@web.de) wrote:
> Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > * Gian Lorenzo Meocci (glmeocci@gmail.com) wrote:
> >> Hi Mathieu,
> >>
> >> thanks for your reply.
> >>
> >> I want specify that:
> >> 1) I am already patching glibc (and, of course, nptl/pthread_*)
> >> 2) I already add two event to pthread_mutex_lock. The first at the
> >> beginning of the function and the second after all return 0 presented
> >> on that function. But those two events are not enough to establish if
> >> a pthread_mutex_lock has been blocking.
> >> In fact I know only the time spent on pthread_mutex_lock. If this time
> >> is little probably I hold the mutex otherwise I was been descheduled.
> >>
> >> So thanks a lot again,
> >>
> >>
> > 
> > Ok, then you will probably want to correlate your information with :
> > 
> > - scheduling activity regarding your threads
> > - system call entry events, especially sys_futex. Note that a thread
> >   calling sys_futex won't _necessarily_ be put to sleep.. it may still
> >   be able to take the lock relatively quickly.
> > 
> > If you need more than that, we may think of instrumenting futex.c, but I
> > am not sure this is required.
> 
> Haven't checked the state of instrumentation recently: Is the futex
> operation visible in the trace now? It used to be not, and we often had
> to guess the reason for sys_futex (wake, wait, pi or not pi, etc.) from
> the context - or add ad-hoc instrumentation.
> 
> Jan
> 

It still isn't instrumented, and I think it would be good to add such
instrumentation.

Have a look at the patch done by K. Prasad for futex.c : it should
probably be updated so it uses tracepoints instead of markers. Anyone
would like to do this ?

See http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/15/125
"[RFC PATCH 0/2] Debugging infrastructure for Futexes using Markers"

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

       reply	other threads:[~2008-12-03  5:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <8d94e9280812021142j2eb5ca72td730410e97ccd9a1@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <20081202195015.GA25792@Krystal>
     [not found]   ` <8d94e9280812021215m6a63d6c2l4e64acd26274953d@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]     ` <20081202215519.GA734@Krystal>
     [not found]       ` <4935B25F.7010701@web.de>
2008-12-03  5:26         ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2008-12-03 18:01           ` [ltt-dev] trace a futex K.Prasad
2008-12-04  8:53             ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-05 12:28               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-12-05 15:58                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-05 16:01                 ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081203052640.GA13701@Krystal \
    --to=compudj@krystal.dyndns.org \
    --cc=glmeocci@gmail.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ltt-dev@lists.casi.polymtl.ca \
    --cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox