public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC] cdrom weirdness
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 04:14:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081204041450.GH28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)

1) CDROM_LOCKDOOR sets a global variable (keeplocked) that affects all
cdroms.  Intentional?

2) cdrom_dvd_rw_close_write() call can be delayed indefinitely by keeping
an ioctl-only (opened with O_NDELAY) descriptor.

3) open cdrom for data, have the door locked, keep fd opened.
   open it again for write, have the open fail and cleanup in cdrom_open()
   will happily unlock the door for you.  I'd change that to "lock if we
   had no lockers, unlock on failure exit if we did lock", but there's
   an interesting comment:
        /* Something failed.  Try to unlock the drive, because some drivers
        (notably ide-cd) lock the drive after every command.
	...
   What the hell is that about?  It's not "some drivers", AFAICT - it's
   been done explicitly in open_for_data().  Or is there something
   really driver-specific in it?

4) while we are at it, if you clear lockdoor via sysctl while something has
   cdrom opened - no unlock on close for you.

5) autoeject happens on the last close *IF* the last file happens to be
   opened for data.  IOW, if some crap has opened it ioctl-only and kept
   that opened after everyone else has closed - no autoeject for you.

6)	/*
	 * flush cache on last write release
	 */
	if (CDROM_CAN(CDC_RAM) && !cdi->use_count && cdi->for_data)
		cdrom_close_write(cdi);
   is interesting, seeing that nothing has ever touched ->for_data, for
   values of "ever" including "since the code in question had been merged
   into the tree"...

             reply	other threads:[~2008-12-04  4:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-04  4:14 Al Viro [this message]
2008-12-04 13:08 ` [RFC] cdrom weirdness Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081204041450.GH28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox