From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
David Safford <safford@watson.ibm.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serue@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] integrity: Linux Integrity Module(LIM)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 08:09:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081204130949.GA18196@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1228342655.2821.64.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 05:17:35PM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > I have a bit of a problem parsing the above, and it certainly doesn't
> > look like a justification for keeping all that unused code around.
>
> The purpose of LIM is to provide an integrity infrastructure to support
> different types of integrity data. IMA implements both the LIM
> API for it's own internal use, and exports it for others to call.
>
> As Dave Safford pointed out in http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/17/362,
> there are other projects that want to add differently structured
> measurements to the TPM measurement list. The template abstraction is
> critical to allowing these differently formatted messages to be added to
> the list.
I think we're talking past each other.
In integrity.h there are two operation vectors defines:
- struct integrity_operations delcares the operations called from the
VFS. This one is actually used. While I don't agree to Dave's
argument, because we don't put bloat in just because people might
eventually some day use it when they are in the right mood and the
sun shines, thisn't isn't the one I'm talking about in this thread.
- struct template_operations on the others is not only really badly
named for appearing in a global header but also not used in a
meaningfull way. There is one single instace of it,
ima_template_ops, and while there are five helpers added in the
second patch that use it (integrity_collect_measurement,
integrity_appraise_measurement, integrity_store_measurement,
integrity_store_template, integrity_must_measure) none of them
is used at all during the patch series. There are two direct
uses of these template added in the third path, to implement the
show operations for the "binary_runtime_measurements" and
"ascii_runtime_measurements" files ins securityfs, but given that
those are inside ima there no reason for the indirection at all.
>
> Mimi
>
>
>
---end quoted text---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-04 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-02 21:47 [PATCH 0/6] integrity Mimi Zohar
2008-12-02 21:47 ` [PATCH 1/6] integrity: TPM internel kernel interface Mimi Zohar
2008-12-02 22:19 ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-04 20:21 ` Rajiv Andrade
2008-12-04 22:31 ` Rajiv Andrade
2008-12-02 22:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-12-03 17:22 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-12-02 21:47 ` [PATCH 2/6] integrity: Linux Integrity Module(LIM) Mimi Zohar
2008-12-02 22:43 ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-03 18:15 ` Mimi Zohar
2008-12-03 18:25 ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-03 12:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-12-03 18:18 ` Mimi Zohar
2008-12-03 18:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-12-03 22:17 ` Mimi Zohar
2008-12-04 13:09 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2008-12-04 19:24 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-12-04 20:53 ` david safford
2008-12-05 1:42 ` James Morris
2008-12-05 12:56 ` david safford
2008-12-05 15:23 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-12-05 17:14 ` david safford
2008-12-02 21:47 ` [PATCH 3/6] integrity: IMA as an integrity service provider Mimi Zohar
2008-12-02 23:35 ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-03 13:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-12-03 16:55 ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-03 17:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-12-03 18:24 ` Mimi Zohar
2008-12-03 18:50 ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-04 18:26 ` Mimi Zohar
2008-12-03 18:17 ` Mimi Zohar
2008-12-03 18:31 ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-05 22:33 ` Al Viro
2008-12-03 19:01 ` Len Brown
2008-12-04 15:57 ` Mimi Zohar
2008-12-03 21:10 ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-02 21:47 ` [PATCH 4/6] integrity: IMA display Mimi Zohar
2008-12-02 21:47 ` [PATCH 5/6] integrity: IMA policy Mimi Zohar
2008-12-02 21:48 ` [PATCH 6/6] integrity: replace task uid with cred uid Mimi Zohar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-12-03 20:13 [PATCH 2/6] integrity: Linux Integrity Module(LIM) Serge E. Hallyn
2008-12-03 20:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081204130949.GA18196@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=safford@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=serue@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=zohar@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox