Re: [PATCH 1/3] param: Adapt MN10300 to the new parameter handling regime

David Howells
2008-12-10T10:39:46Z

Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:

> > > It should, perhaps,
> > > appear in /proc/cmdline, but for some reason it does not.
> >
> > Hmm, that's more concering. I'll dig into this in the morning.
>
> OK, I can't reproduce it. I was thinking some weird corner case
> with not restoring the string in parse_args, but putting in a dummy
> "mem" core_param() on x86 works as first, middle and last arg on cmdline,
> and command line shows up correctly in /proc/cmdline.
>
> Any chance I can ask you to verify that? Is the commandline printk'd
> on boot also wrong?

I think I must've tested it wrong, probably by forgetting to paste in a mem=
option on the kernel command line when I was trying to check /proc/cmdline.
Leastways, it works now.

David