From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754304AbYLGJVt (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Dec 2008 04:21:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753455AbYLGJV2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Dec 2008 04:21:28 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:50782 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753358AbYLGJV1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Dec 2008 04:21:27 -0500 From: Rusty Russell To: David Howells Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] param: Adapt MN10300 to the new parameter handling regime Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 19:51:18 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.10.1 (Linux/2.6.27-9-generic; KDE/4.1.2; i686; ; ) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200812051855.07203.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <2204.1228478296@redhat.com> <200812052325.22974.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200812052325.22974.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200812071951.18907.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 05 December 2008 23:25:22 Rusty Russell wrote: > On Friday 05 December 2008 22:28:16 David Howells wrote: > > With that, the core_param stuff does work for mem=... ... > > It should, perhaps, > > appear in /proc/cmdline, but for some reason it does not. > > Hmm, that's more concering. I'll dig into this in the morning. OK, I can't reproduce it. I was thinking some weird corner case with not restoring the string in parse_args, but putting in a dummy "mem" core_param() on x86 works as first, middle and last arg on cmdline, and command line shows up correctly in /proc/cmdline. Any chance I can ask you to verify that? Is the commandline printk'd on boot also wrong? Thanks, Rusty.