From: Andrew Morton <akpm@google.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PACH] smp: uninline num_online_cpus() & num_possible_cpus()
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 14:43:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081208144331.03888b1b.akpm@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <493965F8.6060407@cosmosbay.com>
On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:33:44 +0100
Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> wrote:
> num_online_cpus() and num_possible_cpus() are not performance
> critical and are quite large.
>
> Unlining them shrinks kernel text size by 7523 bytes on x86,
> if NR_CPUS>32
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
> ---
> include/linux/cpumask.h | 4 ++--
> init/main.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
> index 21e1dd4..f9b2b51 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
> @@ -507,8 +507,8 @@ extern cpumask_t cpu_present_map;
> extern cpumask_t cpu_active_map;
>
> #if NR_CPUS > 1
> -#define num_online_cpus() cpus_weight_nr(cpu_online_map)
> -#define num_possible_cpus() cpus_weight_nr(cpu_possible_map)
> +extern int num_online_cpus(void);
> +extern int num_possible_cpus(void);
> #define num_present_cpus() cpus_weight_nr(cpu_present_map)
> #define cpu_online(cpu) cpu_isset((cpu), cpu_online_map)
> #define cpu_possible(cpu) cpu_isset((cpu), cpu_possible_map)
> diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
> index 7e117a2..a1a3e55 100644
> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@ -376,6 +376,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_mask_all);
> int nr_cpu_ids __read_mostly = NR_CPUS;
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(nr_cpu_ids);
>
> +int num_online_cpus(void)
> +{
> + return cpus_weight_nr(cpu_online_map);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(num_online_cpus);
> +
> +int num_possible_cpus(void)
> +{
> + return cpus_weight_nr(cpu_possible_map);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(num_possible_cpus);
> +
> /* An arch may set nr_cpu_ids earlier if needed, so this would be redundant */
> static void __init setup_nr_cpu_ids(void)
> {
Looks OK.
That area in init/main.c is horrid - it took quite some staring through
the ifdef tangle for me to convince myself that the code you added was
reliably SMP-only.
Perhaps sometime a lot of this cpu masky code should be moved over to
kernel/cpu.c and cleaned up.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-08 22:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-05 17:33 [PACH] smp: uninline num_online_cpus() & num_possible_cpus() Eric Dumazet
2008-12-08 22:43 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-12-09 4:03 ` Rusty Russell
2008-12-09 6:36 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081208144331.03888b1b.akpm@google.com \
--to=akpm@google.com \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox