Re: [PATCH] fix calls to request_module()

[Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>]

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 02:42:28PM +0900, Nguyen Anh Quynh wrote:
> > Ah, but that's different.  Take a look at that warning and think _why_
> > it is given and what is it about.  Getting an untrusted string as
> > format argument is a real security hole, but it has nothing to do
> > with a pile of cases in your patch.
> 
> Yes, clearly the warning is to warn us about potential format string
> bugs. But I agree that there are a lot of false possitives.
> 
> My patch is mainly to make gcc happy.

Your patch is mostly obfuscating the places gcc does *not* warn about...

Looking through it, only
drivers/media/video/cx18/cx18-driver.c
drivers/media/video/ivtv/ivtv-driver.c
drivers/media/video/pvrusb2/pvrusb2-hdw.c
drivers/media/video/zoran/zoran_card.c
drivers/mtd/chips/gen_probe.c
drivers/net/wireless/hostap/hostap_ioctl.c
drivers/of/of_spi.c
drivers/usb/storage/libusual.c
fs/dquot.c
fs/gfs2/locking.c
net/ieee80211/ieee80211_wx.c
sound/core/sound.c

are not of <string literal> -> "%s", <string literal> variety.  Everything
else has never generated a format warning.  At least trim the patch,
removing the obviously useless parts.