Re: [patch 00/83] 2.6.27.9-stable review

Greg KH
2008-12-18T19:03:41Z

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 07:58:35PM +0100, François Valenduc wrote:
> Greg KH a écrit :
> > On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:29:55AM +0100, François Valenduc wrote:
> >
> >> Greg KH a écrit :
> >>
> >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.27.9 release.
> >>> There are 83 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to
> >>> this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let
> >>> us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants
> >>> to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
> >>> These patches are sent out with a number of different people on the Cc:
> >>> line. If you wish to be a reviewer, please email stable@kernel.org to
> >>> add your name to the list. If you want to be off the reviewer list,
> >>> also email us.
> >>> Responses should be made by December 13, 2008, 20:00:00 UTC.
> >>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >>> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/stable-review/patch-2.6.27.9-rc1.gz
> >>> and the diffstat can be found below.
> >>> thanks,
> >>> greg k-h
> >>>
> >> Would it be possible to add these two patches ?
> >>
> >> commit 8258becf07e71236aac8cf5406a1345712f9ac25
> >> Author: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
> >> Date: Tue Sep 23 19:18:43 2008 +0200
> >>
> >> iwlagn: downgrade BUG_ON in interrupt
> >>
> >> commit 199d9de726ff2f949405279665a9c8b38966239b
> >> Author: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
> >> Date: Tue Nov 18 01:47:21 2008 +0100
> >>
> >> iwlagn: fix RX skb alignment
> >>
> >> Without these ones, my computer freezes very frequently (see bugs 11393,
> >> 11983 and 12173 which in fact is a duplicate of the previous one).
> >> These two patches can be applied without any rejects on kernel 2.6.27.8.
> >>
> >
> > I don't see these patches in Linus's kernel tree. Are they not there?
> >
> > Or if they are there, can you give me the correct git commit ids for
> > them?
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> >
> >
>
> These commit ids are indeed not the one of linus's tree and they
> correspond to my local tree for kernel 2.6.27. The correct ids should
> be 4018517a1a69a85c3d61b20fa02f187b80773137 and

That one is already in the 2.6.27.9 release

> 55d6a3cd0cc85ed90c39cf32e16f622bd003117b.

I have queued this one up now.

thanks,

greg k-h