Re: [PATCH 1/1] user namespaces: document CFS behavior

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Quoting James Morris (jmorris@namei.org):
> > On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > > > They're already published in my tree.  Do you want me to revert them?
> > > 
> > > I've also got it published :-/ If it's at the tail of your commits, can 
> > > you reset it?
> > 
> > There have been commits since, and people are using the tree in any case.
> 
> Yikes.  Maybe it's best (henceforth) to keep user namespaces patches in 
> their own tree toward the end of linux-next?  There certainly are 
> security implications with all of them, but other things (filesystem, 
> sched) will be impacted as well...

i'm fine with having this in James's tree - i didnt realize that you had 
another commit that created dependencies.

(if such situations ever cause real damage then we can always create a 
separate branch to track it cleanly. That's not needed now.)

	Ingo