From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>, Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com>,
mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, clock@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
aviro@redhat.com
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: [patch] Re: writing file to disk: not as easy as it looks
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:24:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081215102450.GA9064@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081203050709.GL20858@mit.edu>
Hi!
> > > Heck, if you have a hiccup while writing an inode table block out to
> > > disk (for example a power failure at just the wrong time), so the
> > > memory (which is more voltage sensitive than hard drives) DMA's
> > > garbage which gets written to the inode table, you could lose a large
> > > number of adjacent inodes when garbage gets splatted over the inode
> > > table.
> >
> > Ok, "memory failed before disk" is ... bad hardware.
>
> It's PC class hardware. Live with it. Back when SGI made their own
> hardware, they noticed this problem, and so they wired up their SGI
> machines with powerfail interrupts, and extra big capacitors in
> their
Seems like bad hardware is very common indeed. Anyway, I guess it
would be fair to document what ext3 expects from disk subsystem for
safe operation. Does that summary sound correct/fair?
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/ext3.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/ext3.txt
index 9dd2a3b..3855fbd 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/ext3.txt
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/ext3.txt
@@ -188,6 +188,34 @@ mke2fs: create a ext3 partition with th
debugfs: ext2 and ext3 file system debugger.
ext2online: online (mounted) ext2 and ext3 filesystem resizer
+Requirements
+============
+
+Ext3 expects disk/storage subsystem to behave sanely. On sanely
+behaving disk subsystem, data that have been successfully synced will
+stay on the disk. Sane means:
+
+* writes to media never fail. Even if disk returns error condition during
+ write, ext3 can't handle that correctly, because success on fsync was already
+ returned when data hit the journal.
+
+ (Fortunately writes failing are very uncommon on disks, as they
+ have spare sectors they use when write fails.)
+
+* either whole sector is correctly written or nothing is written during
+ powerfail.
+
+ (Unfortuantely, all the cheap USB/SD flash cards I seen do behave
+ like this, and are unsuitable for ext3. Because RAM tends to fail
+ faster than rest of system during powerfail, special hw killing
+ DMA transfers may be neccessary. Not sure how common that problem
+ is on generic PC machines).
+
+* either write caching is disabled, or hw can do barriers and they are enabled.
+
+ (Note that barriers are disabled by default, use "barrier=1"
+ mount option after making sure hw can support them).
+
References
==========
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-15 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-02 9:40 writing file to disk: not as easy as it looks Pavel Machek
2008-12-02 14:04 ` Theodore Tso
2008-12-02 15:26 ` Pavel Machek
2008-12-02 16:37 ` Theodore Tso
2008-12-02 17:22 ` Chris Friesen
2008-12-02 20:55 ` Theodore Tso
2008-12-02 22:44 ` Pavel Machek
2008-12-02 22:50 ` Pavel Machek
2008-12-03 5:07 ` Theodore Tso
2008-12-03 8:46 ` Pavel Machek
2008-12-03 15:50 ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-12-03 15:54 ` Alan Cox
2008-12-03 17:37 ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-12-03 17:52 ` Alan Cox
2008-12-03 18:16 ` Pavel Machek
2008-12-03 18:33 ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-12-03 16:42 ` Theodore Tso
2008-12-03 17:43 ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-12-03 18:26 ` Pavel Machek
2008-12-03 15:34 ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-12-15 10:24 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2008-12-15 11:03 ` Pavel Machek
2008-12-15 20:08 ` Folkert van Heusden
2008-12-02 19:10 ` Folkert van Heusden
2008-12-02 23:01 ` Mikulas Patocka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081215102450.GA9064@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=aviro@redhat.com \
--cc=cfriesen@nortel.com \
--cc=clock@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox