Re: suspend/resume fails on second attempt in LNXVIDEO:00

Brian J. Murrell
2008-12-16T16:03:04Z

On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:25:37 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> Because the hal-driven whitelist allows us to match systems in a more
> detailed way. If your system is in the s2ram whitelist already and
> works with it, there shouldn't be any difference.

Unfortunately, Ubuntu in their "wisdom" removed s2ram and claim "s2both"
supersedes it in that it does both suspend to disk and suspend to ram and
then suspends, but if your battery dies while suspended you can still
resume from the suspend to disk.

> Still, I was only considering that as a debugging aid in your case,
> because s2ram works in the minimal configuration, while hald doesn't.

Right. I will give s2both a try and see what happens... no joy. It
fails to even run without the swap device mounted, and my swap device is
not big enough to hibernate to anyway. Damn you Ubuntu.

> That's a bit of new information.
>
> What's the list of modules loaded in the minimal configuration?

Module Size Used by
ext3 130568 1
jbd 53908 1 ext3
mbcache 16004 1 ext3
loop 22540 2
usb_storage 78656 0
libusual 30356 1 usb_storage
sd_mod 41240 2
crc_t10dif 10112 1 sd_mod
sr_mod 21956 0
cdrom 42272 1 sr_mod
sg 36148 0
ahci 37260 1
ata_piix 29700 0
pata_acpi 12288 0
ata_generic 13060 0
libata 176160 4 ahci,ata_piix,pata_acpi,ata_generic
scsi_mod 156948 5 usb_storage,sd_mod,sr_mod,sg,libata
8139too 31744 0
8139cp 27776 0
mii 13440 2 8139too,8139cp
ehci_hcd 41996 0
uhci_hcd 30352 0
usbcore 149392 5 usb_storage,libusual,ehci_hcd,uhci_hcd
thermal 23708 0
processor 49708 3 thermal
fan 12676 0
fuse 58780 3

Cheers,
b.