From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Max Kellermann <mk@cm4all.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gcosta@redhat.com,
Grant Coady <grant_lkml@dodo.com.au>,
Tom Tucker <tom@opengridcomputing.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than 120 seconds"
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:55:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081216175503.GG16388@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1229279045.3721.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 06:24:05PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 12:16 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 22:09 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2008-11-30 at 19:17 -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > > > Can you see if the following 3 patches help? They're against 2.6.28-rc6,
> > > > but afaics the problems are pretty much the same on 2.6.26.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > The server was actually running 2.6.25.7 but the matching sources have
> > > since been removed the backports.org so I've reproduce with 2.6.26 and
> > > now I'll add the patches.
> >
> > Just a small progress report. Anecdotally I thought that unpatched
> > 2.6.26.7 was worse than 2.6.25.7, mostly because it hung twice in the ~1
> > day I was running it where previously it was less frequent than once per
> > day.
> >
> > With the patched server the client ran OK for 2.5 days then mysteriously
> > hung, the logs show none of the normal symptoms and my wife reset it
> > before I got home so I've no real clue what happened but I'm inclined to
> > think it was unrelated for now. I'll get back to you in a week or so if
> > the problem hasn't reoccurred.
>
> $ uptime
> 18:15:29 up 9 days, 22 min, 1 user, load average: 0.74, 0.64, 0.46
>
> This is on the problematic client, so it looks like the server side fix
> has sorted it. Thanks very much Trond.
Thanks for the testing! So this was with the following three patches
applied on the server on top of 2.6.26?
[PATCH 1/3] SUNRPC: Ensure the server closes sockets in a timely fashion
[PATCH 2/3] SUNRPC: We only need to call svc_delete_xprt() once...
[PATCH 3/3] SUNRPC: svc_xprt_enqueue should not refuse to enqueue 'XPT_DEAD' transports
I'll try to take a look at these before I leave for the holidays,
assuming the versions Trond posted on Nov. 30 are the latest.
--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-16 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-17 12:32 [PATCH] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than 120 seconds" Max Kellermann
2008-10-17 14:33 ` Glauber Costa
2008-10-20 6:51 ` Max Kellermann
2008-10-20 7:43 ` Ian Campbell
2008-10-20 13:15 ` Glauber Costa
2008-10-20 14:12 ` Max Kellermann
2008-10-20 14:34 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-10-20 14:21 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-05-22 20:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-25 13:12 ` Max Kellermann
2008-10-20 6:27 ` Ian Campbell
2008-11-01 11:45 ` Ian Campbell
2008-11-01 13:41 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-11-02 14:40 ` Ian Campbell
2008-11-07 2:12 ` kenneth johansson
2008-11-04 19:10 ` Ian Campbell
2008-11-25 7:09 ` Ian Campbell
2008-11-25 13:28 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-11-25 13:38 ` Ian Campbell
2008-11-25 13:57 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-11-25 14:04 ` Ian Campbell
2008-11-26 22:12 ` Ian Campbell
2008-12-01 0:17 ` [PATCH 0/3] " Trond Myklebust
2008-12-01 0:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] SUNRPC: Ensure the server closes sockets in a timely fashion Trond Myklebust
2008-12-17 15:27 ` Tom Tucker
2008-12-17 18:08 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-12-17 18:59 ` Tom Tucker
2008-12-01 0:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] SUNRPC: We only need to call svc_delete_xprt() once Trond Myklebust
2008-12-01 0:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] SUNRPC: svc_xprt_enqueue should not refuse to enqueue 'XPT_DEAD' transports Trond Myklebust
2008-12-17 15:35 ` Tom Tucker
2008-12-17 19:07 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-12-23 14:49 ` Tom Tucker
2008-12-23 23:39 ` Tom Tucker
2008-12-01 0:29 ` [PATCH 0/3] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than 120 seconds" Trond Myklebust
2008-12-02 15:22 ` Kasparek Tomas
2008-12-02 15:37 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-12-02 16:26 ` Kasparek Tomas
2008-12-02 18:10 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-12-01 22:09 ` Ian Campbell
2008-12-06 12:16 ` Ian Campbell
2008-12-14 18:24 ` Ian Campbell
2008-12-16 17:55 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2008-12-16 18:39 ` Ian Campbell
2009-01-07 22:21 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-08 18:20 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-08 21:22 ` Ian Campbell
2009-01-08 21:26 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-12 9:46 ` Ian Campbell
2009-01-22 8:27 ` Ian Campbell
2009-01-22 16:44 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081216175503.GG16388@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=gcosta@redhat.com \
--cc=grant_lkml@dodo.com.au \
--cc=ijc@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mk@cm4all.com \
--cc=tom@opengridcomputing.com \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox