From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757447AbYLPTz2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:55:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752474AbYLPTzU (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:55:20 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:59224 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751786AbYLPTzT (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:55:19 -0500 Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:55:05 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] x86: Support always running TSC on Intel CPUs Message-ID: <20081216195505.GC4501@elte.hu> References: <20081125235751.576792000@intel.com> <20081125235852.402898000@intel.com> <7E82351C108FA840AB1866AC776AEC464338C10B@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com> <4946E05E.9080503@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4946E05E.9080503@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0008] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote: >> hpa/Ingo, >> >> Haven't seen any comments on the patches here. Can you push it along in case there are no issues. >> > > Hi Venki, > > Sorry about that -- I think you know what's up on my end :) Will look at > it as soon as I can. okay - i queued it up in x86/tsc. It looked sane last time too, just the 'NOSTOP_TSC' name sucked. I changed it to NONSTOP_TSC - hopefully we wont ever need a REALLY_NON_STOP_TSC distinction in the future ;-) Ingo