public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "K.Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu,
	richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch 1/9] Introducing generic hardware breakpoint handler interfaces
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 09:17:03 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081217034703.GA5084@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <493831A9.3050904@caviumnetworks.com>

On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 11:38:17AM -0800, David Daney wrote:
> K.Prasad wrote:
> [...]
>> + * len and type values are defined in include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h.
>> + * Available values vary according to the architecture.  On i386 the
>> + * possibilities are:
>> + *
>> + *	HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_1
>> + *	HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_2
>> + *	HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_4
>> + *	HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_EXECUTE
>> + *	HW_BREAKPOINT_RW
>> + *	HW_BREAKPOINT_READ
>> + *	HW_BREAKPOINT_EXECUTE
>> + *
>> + * On other architectures HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_8 may be available, and the
>> + * 1-, 2-, and 4-byte lengths may be unavailable.  There also may be
>> + * HW_BREAKPOINT_WRITE.  You can use #ifdef to check at compile time.
>> + */
>
> On MIPS we support breakpoint lengths that are powers of 2 between 8 and  
> 4096.  Do you really want symbolic values for these?  The debuggers have  
> to do calculations with the length values, so translating between the  
> symbolic values and numeric values would be tedious at best.
>
>
> David Daney

Given that the possible values for length are finite and small on
x86(just three of them), it was chosen to be defined as constants.

For architectures such as MIPS where a range of lengths can be possibly
monitored using HW Breakpoints, the arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings()
maybe suitably written to validate the input and the 'length' may also
be specified in numeric terms to the kernel interface (say
register_kernel_hw_breakpoint()).

Thanks,
K.Prasad


  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-17  3:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-04 19:08 [RFC Patch 0/9] Hardware Breakpoint interfaces - v2 K.Prasad
2008-12-04 19:11 ` [RFC Patch 1/9] Introducing generic hardware breakpoint handler interfaces K.Prasad
2008-12-04 19:38   ` David Daney
2008-12-17  3:47     ` K.Prasad [this message]
2008-12-04 19:11 ` [RFC Patch 2/9] x86 architecture implementation of Hardware Breakpoint interfaces K.Prasad
2008-12-04 19:12 ` [RFC Patch 3/9] Modifying generic debug exception to use virtual debug registers K.Prasad
2008-12-04 19:13 ` [RFC Patch 4/9] Modify kprobe exception handler to recognise single-stepping by HW Breakpoint handler K.Prasad
2008-12-04 19:13 ` [RFC Patch 5/9] Use wrapper routines around debug registers in processor related functions K.Prasad
2008-12-04 19:13 ` [RFC Patch 6/9] Use virtual debug registers in process/thread handling code K.Prasad
2008-12-04 19:14 ` [RFC Patch 7/9] Modify signal handling code to refrain from re-enabling HW Breakpoints K.Prasad
2008-12-04 19:16 ` [RFC Patch 8/9] Modify Ptrace routines to access breakpoint registers K.Prasad
2008-12-04 19:17 ` [RFC Patch 9/9] Cleanup HW Breakpoint registers before kexec K.Prasad
2008-12-04 19:17 ` [RFC Patch 0/9] Hardware Breakpoint interfaces - v2 K.Prasad
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-12-18 16:34 [RFC Patch 1/9] Introducing generic hardware breakpoint handler interfaces Richard J Moore
2008-10-20  9:33 Albert Cahalan
2008-10-20  9:52 ` K.Prasad
2008-10-08 19:20 [RFC Patch 0/9] Hardware Breakpoint interfaces - v2 K.Prasad
2008-10-08 19:23 ` [RFC Patch 1/9] Introducing generic hardware breakpoint handler interfaces K.Prasad
2008-10-16  2:49   ` Roland McGrath
2008-10-16  3:45     ` K.Prasad
2008-10-18  0:34       ` Roland McGrath
2008-10-16 14:38     ` Alan Stern
2008-10-17 23:58       ` Roland McGrath
2008-10-18 15:23         ` Alan Stern
2008-10-07 11:38 [RFC Patch 0/9] Hardware Breakpoint interfaces K.Prasad
2008-10-07 11:40 ` [RFC Patch 1/9] Introducing generic hardware breakpoint handler interfaces K.Prasad
2008-10-07 15:21   ` Alan Stern
2008-10-07 16:49     ` K.Prasad

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081217034703.GA5084@in.ibm.com \
    --to=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox