From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753155AbYLQXNT (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:13:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751393AbYLQXNF (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:13:05 -0500 Received: from corega.com.ru ([195.178.208.66]:56785 "EHLO tservice.net.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751379AbYLQXNE (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:13:04 -0500 Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:13:02 +0300 From: Evgeniy Polyakov To: Eric Paris Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, ttb@tentacle.dhs.org, rml@novell.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] filesystem notification: create fs/notify to contain all fs notification Message-ID: <20081217231302.GC28283@ioremap.net> References: <20081217185941.2188.49536.stgit@paris.rdu.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081217185941.2188.49536.stgit@paris.rdu.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Eric. On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 01:59:41PM -0500, Eric Paris (eparis@redhat.com) wrote: > Creating a generic filesystem notification interface, fsnotify, which will be > used by inotify, dnotify, and eventually fanotify is really starting to > clutter the fs directory. This patch simply moves inotify and dnotify into > fs/notify/inotify and fs/notify/dnotify respectively to make both current fs/ > and future notification tidier. Looks good, but what with the another patches in the series? -- Evgeniy Polyakov