public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, rjw@sisk.pl, tglx@linutronix.de,
	lenb@kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	davej@redhat.com
Subject: Re: SMP poweroff hangs:  it's baaaack!  But on x86_64 this time.
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:59:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081219115917.GA1599@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49491F32.1040400@rtr.ca>

On Wed 2008-12-17 10:48:02, Mark Lord wrote:
>> Subject: Fix SMP poweroff hangs
>> From: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
>>
>> We need to disable all CPUs other than the boot CPU (usually 0) before
>> attempting to power-off modern SMP machines.  This fixes the
>> hang-on-poweroff issue on my MythTV SMP box, and also on Thomas Gleixner's
>> new toybox.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mark Lord <mlord@pobox.com>
>> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>> ---
>>
>>  kernel/sys.c |    2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff -puN kernel/sys.c~fix-smp-poweroff-hangs kernel/sys.c
>> --- a/kernel/sys.c~fix-smp-poweroff-hangs
>> +++ a/kernel/sys.c
>> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/getcpu.h>
>>  #include <linux/task_io_accounting_ops.h>
>>  #include <linux/seccomp.h>
>> +#include <linux/cpu.h>
>>   #include <linux/compat.h>
>>  #include <linux/syscalls.h>
>> @@ -878,6 +879,7 @@ void kernel_power_off(void)
>>  	kernel_shutdown_prepare(SYSTEM_POWER_OFF);
>>  	if (pm_power_off_prepare)
>>  		pm_power_off_prepare();
>> +	disable_nonboot_cpus();
>>  	sysdev_shutdown();
>>  	printk(KERN_EMERG "Power down.\n");
>>  	machine_power_off();
> ..
>
> This bug has returned here now, but on x86_86 this time around.
> Same machine as before, just upgraded toa 64-bit kernel/user (2.6.27.9)
> from the original 32-bit kernel/user that was originally fixed (above).
>
> One hang at poweroff over the past 10 days.  Not much, but enough
> to destroy confidence in "unattended" operation.
>
> I lack opportunity to dig further into the code for now,
> but just wanted to flag the problem, in case similar reports
> from others might already be out there.
>
> In the meanwhile, I'm experimenting with this simple patch,
> garnered from the 32-bit investigations last time around.
> We should know in a few weeks whether it has any effect or not.
>
> --- old/kernel/sys.c	2008-10-18 13:57:22.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6.27.9/kernel/sys.c	2008-12-17 09:42:17.000000000 -0500
> @@ -303,6 +303,8 @@
>
> static void kernel_shutdown_prepare(enum system_states state)
> {
> +	set_cpus_allowed(current, cpumask_of_cpu(first_cpu(cpu_online_map)));

Is this line neccessary? 

> +	disable_nonboot_cpus();
> 	blocking_notifier_call_chain(&reboot_notifier_list,
> 		(state == SYSTEM_HALT)?SYS_HALT:SYS_POWER_OFF, NULL);
> 	system_state = state;
> @@ -333,7 +335,6 @@
> 	kernel_shutdown_prepare(SYSTEM_POWER_OFF);
> 	if (pm_power_off_prepare)
> 		pm_power_off_prepare();
> -	disable_nonboot_cpus();
> 	sysdev_shutdown();
> 	printk(KERN_EMERG "Power down.\n");
> 	machine_power_off();

Do you have any idea why it helps? BIOS will see us shutting down on
cpu0 anyway, so if this helps there's a linux bug somewhere...

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-19 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20071213053020.E28AB1454450@imap.suse.de>
     [not found] ` <4761601B.3030408@rtr.ca>
     [not found]   ` <20071213164545.GA10593@suse.de>
2007-12-13 17:30     ` patch revert-fix-smp-poweroff-hangs.patch queued to -stable tree Dave Jones
     [not found]     ` <47616C15.7030604@rtr.ca>
     [not found]       ` <47616F8C.9030803@rtr.ca>
2008-12-17 15:48         ` SMP poweroff hangs: it's baaaack! But on x86_64 this time Mark Lord
2008-12-19 11:59           ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2008-12-20  2:19             ` Mark Lord
2008-12-22 15:48               ` Mark Lord
2009-01-05  4:37                 ` Mark Lord

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081219115917.GA1599@ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=lkml@rtr.ca \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox