From: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
mingo@elte.hu, dipankar@in.ibm.com, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ego@in.ibm.com, andi@firstfloor.org,
davecb@sun.com, tconnors@astro.swin.edu.au, maxk@qualcomm.com,
gregory.haskins@gmail.com, pavel@suse.cz,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/8] sched: nominate preferred wakeup cpu
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:26:52 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081220105652.GD24181@dirshya.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081220103602.GC24181@dirshya.in.ibm.com>
* Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [2008-12-20 16:06:02]:
> * Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [2008-12-20 15:32:28]:
>
> > * Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> [2008-12-19 20:44:55]:
> >
> > > On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 10:06:38 +0530 Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > kernel/sched.c: In function 'schedule':
> > > > > kernel/sched.c:3679: warning: 'active_balance' may be used uninitialized in this function
> > > > >
> > > > > This warning is correct - the code is buggy.
> > > >
> > > > Yes this is my code bug. I did not see the warning in sched.c. Is
> > > > there any build option that I need to pass in order to get -Wall
> > > > effect?
> > >
> > > That was just with plain old kbuild: `make allmodconfig;make'.
> > >
> > > That warning was produced by gcc-4.0.2. If you're using something more
> > > recent then gcc has regressed.
> >
> > This is an interesting problem. I am unable to get that warning in the
> > following GCC versions even with a combination of the following
> > cmdline options: -Wall -Wextra -Wuninitialized
> >
> > gcc version 4.1.2 20070502
> > gcc version 4.2.3
> >
> > I will look for older gcc and check this out.
>
> I am able to get the above warning in
> gcc version 3.4.6 (Debian 3.4.6-9)
> with default kbuild, no additional params.
>
> Did not get the warning in
> gcc version 4.1.3 20080623
>
> Hence there has been some change in GCC that prevented the
> uninitialized warning.
Related GCC bug: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179
Claimed to have been fixed in GCC 4.4, but I don't know if we are ready
to test kernel compile with GCC 4.4.
I have tested till gcc version 4.3.2 (Debian 4.3.2-1) and the bug
is not fixed. I do not get the warning from sched.c.
--Vaidy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-20 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-18 17:55 [PATCH v7 0/8] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 1/8] sched: convert BALANCE_FOR_xx_POWER to inline functions Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 2/8] sched: Framework for sched_mc/smt_power_savings=N Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 3/8] sched: favour lower logical cpu number for sched_mc balance Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 4/8] sched: nominate preferred wakeup cpu Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 18:12 ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-19 21:55 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-19 22:19 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-19 22:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-19 22:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-19 22:38 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-19 22:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-20 4:36 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-20 4:44 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-20 7:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-20 10:02 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-20 10:36 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-20 10:56 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan [this message]
2008-12-21 8:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 5/8] sched: bias task wakeups to preferred semi-idle packages Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 18:11 ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 6/8] sched: activate active load balancing in new idle cpus Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 7/8] sched: add SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE at MC and CPU level for sched_mc>0 Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 8/8] sched: idle_balance() does not call load_balance_newidle() Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 18:12 ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-18 20:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-18 20:19 ` [PATCH v7 0/8] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n Ingo Molnar
2008-12-18 20:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-19 8:29 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-19 8:24 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-19 13:34 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-29 23:43 ` MinChan Kim
2008-12-30 2:48 ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-30 6:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30 6:44 ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-30 7:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30 18:07 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-02 7:26 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-02 22:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 7:29 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-03 10:16 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-03 11:22 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-04 15:00 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-04 18:19 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-04 19:52 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-05 3:20 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-05 4:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-05 6:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-05 15:19 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-06 9:31 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-06 15:07 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-06 17:48 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-06 18:45 ` Balbir Singh
2009-01-07 8:59 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-07 11:26 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-07 14:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-07 15:35 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-08 8:06 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-08 17:46 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-09 6:00 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-06 14:54 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-30 17:31 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081220105652.GD24181@dirshya.in.ibm.com \
--to=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=davecb@sun.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=gregory.haskins@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tconnors@astro.swin.edu.au \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox