public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: per-cpu stats in block device: overkill?
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:26:09 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200812221426.09723.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <494EF3AA.9040100@kernel.org>

On Monday 22 December 2008 12:25:54 Tejun Heo wrote:
> I'm working on local counter (local_t) allocator which is used to
> replace percpu allocation in percpu_counter and used as basis for
> percpu_ref which replaces module ref counting and will be used to
> simplify block/char lifetime rules.

Hi Tejun,

   Interesting!  Thanks to Christoph's dynamic percpu efforts, I've
been revising efforts to make alloc_percpu use the same efficient
mechanism that static percpu vars use.  We actually have this code
already, tucked away in module.c.

   This work is basically complete; the step I started this morning
is to remove the per_cpu__ prefix hackery from the per-cpu ops (in favour
of sparse annotations).  This leads to cpu_local_inc et. al. being usable
for alloc_percpu-created percpu vars, not just static ones.

> The local counter allocator allocates per-cpu pages and the space
> overhead is minimal.  If per-cpu stats in genhd is necessary, I think
> converting it to percpu local counter allocation should do it.

   Interesting; an allyesconfig boot uses 194 per-cpu allocs from
lib/percpu_counter.c at the moment.  The module.c allocator is fairly space
efficient: 4 bytes per "block" (ie. each allocation or hole) but slow,
which I figure is OK.  Packing is good though.

> BTW, why make percpu area static?

   Good question.  Archs use a simple offset for per-cpu areas: some hold
this in a register (eg. %fs for x86-32).  This means that the layout must be
"congruent" (ie. have the same inter-cpu spacing) if we allocate a new
per-cpu area (hard for non-NUMA).

  For 5 years I waited for this to be fixed, and avoided exposing the per-cpu
core, and the alloc_percpu stuff was a standin implementation.  But Christoph
L. showed that even with the size limit, there are numerous places which want
small per-cpu allocations which are optimally accessed, so I restarted work.
See Message-Id: <20081117132630.33F09DDDF5@ozlabs.org> "[PATCH 1/7] Improve
alloc_percpu: make the per cpu reserve configurable and larger." and thread.

  In addition, Mathieu and I have been discussing local_t: it's wandered
off its original purpose and we're debating what to do about it.  See
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0812150823370.18692@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
"local_add_return" and thread.

I look forward to always-cogent your thoughts on these issues!
Rusty.

      reply	other threads:[~2008-12-22  3:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-22  0:19 per-cpu stats in block device: overkill? Rusty Russell
2008-12-22  1:55 ` Tejun Heo
2008-12-22  3:56   ` Rusty Russell [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200812221426.09723.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=jmarchan@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox