From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, roland@redhat.com, bastian@waldi.eu.org,
daniel@hozac.com, xemul@openvz.org, containers@lists.osdl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/7][v4] Define siginfo_from_ancestor_ns()
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 23:03:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081224220358.GA3851@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081224212426.GD13502@us.ibm.com>
On 12/24, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
>
> Oleg Nesterov [oleg@redhat.com] wrote:
> | And, SI_ASYNCIO only matters when we send the signal to the subnamespace,
> | and in that case we will probably mangle .si_pid. So why don't we warn
> | when .si_code == SI_USER?
>
> I was wondering if I should there too :-) But what do you think ?
Well, if you ask me, I'd suggest to document the problems with
sigqueueinfo() and forget. Whatever we do, we can't be always
right.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-24 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-24 11:44 [PATCH 0/7][v4] Container-init signal semantics Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-24 11:50 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7][v4] Remove 'handler' parameter to tracehook functions Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-24 11:50 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7][v4] Protect init from unwanted signals more Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-24 16:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-12-24 21:11 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-24 11:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7][v4] Define siginfo_from_ancestor_ns() Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-24 16:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-12-24 21:24 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-24 22:03 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2008-12-27 20:38 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-24 11:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7][v4] Protect cinit from unblocked SIG_DFL signals Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-24 11:52 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7][v4] Protect cinit from blocked fatal signals Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-24 16:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-12-24 21:25 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-31 0:04 ` Roland McGrath
2009-01-05 12:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-12-24 11:53 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7][v4] SI_USER: Masquerade si_pid when crossing pid ns boundary Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-24 15:43 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-12-24 16:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-12-24 21:08 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-24 11:53 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7][v4] SI_TKILL: " Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-24 15:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-12-24 21:04 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-24 21:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081224220358.GA3851@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=bastian@waldi.eu.org \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=daniel@hozac.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox