From: "Américo Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Check return from argv_split() in do_coredump().
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 15:06:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081226150653.GD3156@hack.private> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200812260700.mBQ70uH3009595@www262.sakura.ne.jp>
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 04:00:56PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>Hello.
>
>Am^[$(D+1rico Wang wrote:
>> How about going to the line:
>>
>> current->fsuid = fsuid;
>>
>> ? Because when argv_split() fails, helper_argv is NULL and doesn't need
>> to be checked again.
>
>I didn't understand what you say. I'm saying that
>"do_coredump() may accesss helper_argv[0] when helper_argv == NULL",
>which will result in "NULL pointer dereference" problem.
>Yes, this problem unlikely happens. Thus,
>
>if (!helper_argv)
> goto fail_unlock;
>
>may be enough.
>
Yes, goto fail_unlock will go to this line:
if (helper_argv)
argv_free(helper_argv);
but in this situation, helper_argv is known as NULL, thus another
check doesn't need. So we can go to the line below, i.e.
fail_unlock:
if (helper_argv)
argv_free(helper_argv);
current->fsuid = fsuid; //<=== goto this line
coredump_finish(mm);
You need to add a new label, of course. :)
--
"Against stupidity, the gods themselves, contend in vain."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-26 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-24 6:16 [PATCH] Check return from argv_split() in do_coredump() Tetsuo Handa
2008-12-26 14:45 ` Américo Wang
2008-12-26 7:00 ` Tetsuo Handa
2008-12-26 15:06 ` Américo Wang [this message]
2008-12-26 13:20 ` Tetsuo Handa
2008-12-26 13:54 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081226150653.GD3156@hack.private \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox