The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hrtimer: increase clock min delta threshold while interrupt hanging
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 15:00:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081227140032.GB5671@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081227105334.GJ14639@elte.hu>

On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 11:53:34AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Impact: avoid hanging on slow systems
> > 
> > While using the function graph tracer on a virtualized system, the 
> > hrtimer_interrupt can hang the system on an infinite loop. This can be 
> > caused on several situation where something intrusive is slowing the 
> > system (ie: tracing) and the next clock events to program are always 
> > before the current time. This patch implements a reasonable compromise. 
> > If such a situation is detected, we share the CPUs time in 1/4 to 
> > process the hrtimer interrupts. This is enough to let the system running 
> > without serious starvation.
> > 
> > It has been successfully tested under VirtualBox with 1000 HZ and 100 HZ 
> > with function graph tracer launched. On both cases, the clock events 
> > were increased until about 25 ms periodic ticks, which means 40 HZ.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > ---
> >  kernel/hrtimer.c |   30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> applied to tip/timers/hrtimers, thanks Frederic!


I will apply the comments that came along these reviews in a delta patch.
Note that I still wonder about false positive with a 5 loop check. I think
I will increase it to 10. This a more reasonable.

(I remember I had false positive but I'm not sure if that was because of early_printk
used for debugging. I didn't worry about it first, because I hadn't these false positive
on my last tests, just before I send this patch.)

> 
> Thomas, any objections/observations?
> 
> 	Ingo


      reply	other threads:[~2008-12-27 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-22  1:24 [PATCH] hrtimer: increase clock min delta threshold while interrupt hanging Frederic Weisbecker
2008-12-22  2:07 ` Frans Pop
2008-12-22  7:00   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-22  9:00     ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2008-12-22  9:05       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-22  9:24         ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2008-12-22  9:04   ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2008-12-22 20:41     ` Frans Pop
2008-12-22 15:17 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-12-22 15:28   ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2008-12-27 10:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-27 14:00   ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081227140032.GB5671@nowhere \
    --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox