From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: oleg@redhat.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, roland@redhat.com,
bastian@waldi.eu.org
Cc: daniel@hozac.com, xemul@openvz.org, containers@lists.osdl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/6][v5] Define siginfo_from_ancestor_ns()
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 12:52:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081227205222.GB27337@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081227204658.GA27197@us.ibm.com>
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:46:02 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 3/6][v5] Define siginfo_from_ancestor_ns()
Determine if sender of a signal is from an ancestor namespace. This
function will be used in a follow-on patch.
This is based on discussions on the patch from Oleg Nesterov and me
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/25/462.
Changelog[v5]:
- (Oleg Nesterov) Put siginfo_from_ancestor_ns() back under
CONFIG_PID_NS.
- (Oleg Nesterov) Remove the warning in rt_sigqueueinfo().
Changelog[v4]:
- siginfo_from_ancestor_ns() is fairly clean and it does not need
to be under CONFIG_PID_NS. Only siginfo_from_user() needs to be.
- Warn if rt_sigqueueinfo() uses SI_ASYNCIO.
- Added a check for pid-ns of receiver being NULL (in case it is
exiting).
Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/signal.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index 30b9c5c..f33100d 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -820,6 +820,61 @@ static inline int legacy_queue(struct sigpending *signals, int sig)
{
return (sig < SIGRTMIN) && sigismember(&signals->signal, sig);
}
+/*
+ * Return 1 if this signal originated directly from a user process (i.e via
+ * kill(), tkill(), sigqueue()). Return 0 otherwise.
+ *
+ * TODO:
+ * To make this less hacky, make SI_ASYNCIO a kernel signal.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_PID_NS
+static inline int siginfo_from_user(siginfo_t *info)
+{
+ if (!is_si_special(info) && SI_FROMUSER(info) &&
+ info->si_code != SI_ASYNCIO)
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int siginfo_from_ancestor_ns(struct task_struct *t,
+ siginfo_t *info)
+{
+ struct pid_namespace *ns;
+
+ /*
+ * Ensure signal is from user-space before checking pid namespace.
+ * (We maybe called from interrupt context and dereferencing
+ * pid namespace would be safe).
+ */
+ if (siginfo_from_user(info)) {
+ /*
+ * If we do not have a pid in the receiver's namespace,
+ * we must be from an ancestor namespace.
+ *
+ * Note:
+ * If receiver is exiting, ns == NULL, signal will be
+ * queued but eventually ignored anyway (wants_signal()
+ * is FALSE). Assume here that signal is from ancestor
+ * namespace and queue the signal.
+ */
+ ns = task_active_pid_ns(t);
+ if (!ns || task_pid_nr_ns(current, ns) <= 0)
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+#else
+
+static inline int siginfo_from_ancestor_ns(struct task_struct *t,
+ siginfo_t *info)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+#endif
static int send_signal(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t,
int group)
@@ -2324,6 +2379,7 @@ sys_rt_sigqueueinfo(pid_t pid, int sig, siginfo_t __user *uinfo)
Nor can they impersonate a kill(), which adds source info. */
if (info.si_code >= 0)
return -EPERM;
+
info.si_signo = sig;
/* POSIX.1b doesn't mention process groups. */
--
1.5.2.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-27 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-27 20:46 [PATCH 0/6][v5]: Container-init signal semantics Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-27 20:49 ` [PATCH 1/6][v5] Remove 'handler' parameter to tracehook functions Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-27 20:51 ` [PATCH 2/6][v5] Protect init from unwanted signals more Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-27 20:52 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu [this message]
2008-12-31 0:12 ` [PATCH 3/6][v5] Define siginfo_from_ancestor_ns() Roland McGrath
2009-01-05 12:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-05 14:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-12-27 20:53 ` [PATCH 4/6][v5] Protect cinit from unblocked SIG_DFL signals Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-31 0:19 ` Roland McGrath
2009-01-05 13:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-12-27 20:54 ` [PATCH 5/6][v5] Protect cinit from blocked fatal signals Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-01-05 15:16 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-12-27 20:55 ` [PATCH 6/6][v5] SI_USER: Masquerade si_pid when crossing pid ns boundary Sukadev Bhattiprolu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081227205222.GB27337@us.ibm.com \
--to=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bastian@waldi.eu.org \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=daniel@hozac.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox