Re: [1/9] pohmelfs: documentation.

Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-12-30T21:23:49Z

Hi Paolo.

On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 11:19:29PM +0100, Paolo Ciarrocchi (paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com) wrote:
> Performance seems to be the most important argument in favour of pohmelfs.
> You should probably add more performance data in the cover letter of
> the patch serie. All the information are already available but not
> easy to be reached.
> In short, try to do a better work in "selling" your product :-)

I will create easily understandible graphs and put a link to them into
the description. Performance is indeed one of the interesting parts
among POHMELFS features.

--
Evgeniy Polyakov