Re: [git pull] sparseirq / irq updates for v2.6.29

Yinghai Lu
2008-12-29T00:06:20Z

On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 3:55 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> ok, agreed. I was hoping for some more generic workaround but nothing
>> seemed to keep gcc from inlining such functions.
>>
>
> Other than blacklisting those gcc versions. It's pretty easy to
> understand how a bug like that could creep in, since one of the main
> improvements of the early gcc4 series was better inlining as an
> optimization.

1. one time path add one dummy printk
2. multi path, could move it to another file.
could add one like kernel/weak.c to collect those ...

>
> --
> H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
> I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

good to know.

YH